rdfs:comment
| - Shouldn't the site notice read, "Recent updates by our hosting service have broken the Monaco skin. As a work-around to make pages legible, use your preferences to choose Monobook or Wikia." (1) The current notice reads ambiguously, as if we might have done something to harm the beloved/maligned Monaco. (2) There are really only two choices for skins (or, at least, I only have two). (3) In theory, this is supposed to be temporary, right? —Tennessee Ernie Ford (TEF) 17:01, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
|
abstract
| - Shouldn't the site notice read, "Recent updates by our hosting service have broken the Monaco skin. As a work-around to make pages legible, use your preferences to choose Monobook or Wikia." (1) The current notice reads ambiguously, as if we might have done something to harm the beloved/maligned Monaco. (2) There are really only two choices for skins (or, at least, I only have two). (3) In theory, this is supposed to be temporary, right? —Tennessee Ernie Ford (TEF) 17:01, October 13, 2010 (UTC) The issue's fixed now, anyway -- RandomTime 17:07, October 13, 2010 (UTC) What do you mean you only have two choices for skins? --JonTheMon 17:08, October 13, 2010 (UTC) 1.
* Monobook
* Monobook Duh -- RandomTime 17:19, October 13, 2010 (UTC) My choices are: New Wikia; Monaco; MonoBook. Since Monaco is borked, that leaves MonoBook and Wikia. (Practically speaking, as RT suggests, that leaves only MonoBook, since Wikia is almost as illegible on GWiki as the borked Monaco.) —Tennessee Ernie Ford (TEF) 17:36, October 13, 2010 (UTC) The preferences link with &useskin=monobook was necessary because monaco was so broken that preferences was inaccessible without hunting down the phantom search box and typing in "Special:Preferences," and even then it was virtually unusable. The wording wasn't super important to me. Image:Felix Omni Signature.png 18:07, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
|