About: RuneScape talk:User treatment policy   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Read and give your feedback please. --Whiplash 15:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Does no one care of the new policy so I can just impliment it? --Whiplash 21:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC) The problem is that people will get into these arguements and brush off the policies, even when reminded. =| --Sαcrε Fι (edit my sig) | (edit my user page) 01:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Oh, I also think that we need harsher blocks for violators of policies to make them more solid, especially for repeat offenders. File:Slayer-icon.png Gangsterls File:Divination-icon.png talk02:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape talk:User treatment policy
rdfs:comment
  • Read and give your feedback please. --Whiplash 15:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Does no one care of the new policy so I can just impliment it? --Whiplash 21:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC) The problem is that people will get into these arguements and brush off the policies, even when reminded. =| --Sαcrε Fι (edit my sig) | (edit my user page) 01:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Oh, I also think that we need harsher blocks for violators of policies to make them more solid, especially for repeat offenders. File:Slayer-icon.png Gangsterls File:Divination-icon.png talk02:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Read and give your feedback please. --Whiplash 15:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Does no one care of the new policy so I can just impliment it? --Whiplash 21:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC) The problem is that people will get into these arguements and brush off the policies, even when reminded. =| --Sαcrε Fι (edit my sig) | (edit my user page) 01:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC) I like it =). I expanded it, and added that the first thing users should do when they get into an edit war is to refer to the style guide for the solution. After all, many edit wars are just stubborn fights which could be resolved in a second by simply scanning the style guide. I put Whip's method as the alternative in the case of no other solution. Should we protect policy pages? People could still suggest additions/clarifications on their talk pages. They're pretty important, like the MediaWiki pages. File:Slayer-icon.png Gangsterls File:Divination-icon.png talk02:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Oh, I also think that we need harsher blocks for violators of policies to make them more solid, especially for repeat offenders. File:Slayer-icon.png Gangsterls File:Divination-icon.png talk02:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Don't you think it's sad that I got a block for swearing to Clv309 when she said things like "I don't give a damn" "Fuck you" and "You're an idiot". Sad, just sad. The King of Fakes 03:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software