I rewrote this article for Conservation Week, because I'm a team player and I care. But I'm not feeling so hot about it. I'd appreciate it if someone would, you know, review this. Syndrome 07:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC) I'm about to review this article right here. Yeah. Okay, that's enough thinking for me today. I'm off to look at porn on Uncyclopedia now. Thanks again for the comments. --Syndrome 06:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The life of MC Hammer
|
| rdfs:comment
| - I rewrote this article for Conservation Week, because I'm a team player and I care. But I'm not feeling so hot about it. I'd appreciate it if someone would, you know, review this. Syndrome 07:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC) I'm about to review this article right here. Yeah. Okay, that's enough thinking for me today. I'm off to look at porn on Uncyclopedia now. Thanks again for the comments. --Syndrome 06:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Mcomment
| - I kinda liked the way you did all of this.
|
| Pcomment
| - Everything was pretty nice and neat. The spelling was very good, but the vocabulary made it sound a little less professional. I couldn't decide if you wanted it to sound serious or silly.
|
| Icomment
| - There was only one image, which was okay. You're lucky I'm nice enough to give a 5 on this one.
|
| Pscore
| |
| Ccomment
| - Eh. The idea of making him a saint was a little original, but it was mostly the way you wrote it out that made this article good.
|
| Cscore
| |
| Mscore
| |
| Hcomment
| - "Hammer was assassinated by some gunman in a museum at the peak of his career. It turns out they could touch this after all." That was probably my favorite line. It didn't make me laugh out loud, but a lot of it made me chuckle, giving it a 6.7.
|
| Iscore
| |
| Hscore
| |
| Fcomment
| - Overall, a pretty solid article, but it could be improved. Some more pictures, a longer article, and some more humor would make this a superb article thingy.
|
| dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| Signature
| |
| abstract
| - I rewrote this article for Conservation Week, because I'm a team player and I care. But I'm not feeling so hot about it. I'd appreciate it if someone would, you know, review this. Syndrome 07:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC) I'm about to review this article right here. Yeah. Thanks for the review! Definitely gives me something to think of as I prepare for a new killer article. Good point about the inconsistent tone. I do need to look out for that. About the sainthood---I wanted to throw in something about a connection between Hammer and Mr. T since they're both religious figures (you know the picture of Mr. T I'm referring to) but I decided that would make the article too scattered if I tried to work that in. Or maybe I just forgot about it altogether. One of those. As for the images (there are two, but one looks like LaTeX), I haven't touched Photoshop in years and I'm afraid to because (1) It's bleeding expensive and (2) I know I could never compare to some of the masters of our time, like rcmurphy or everyone who's made a featured image. But I guess that's no reason I shouldn't piddle around in GIMP and at least try something, right? The main image on that page was put there by the original creator. Okay, that's enough thinking for me today. I'm off to look at porn on Uncyclopedia now. Thanks again for the comments. --Syndrome 06:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)