Just to clarify, I'm not opposed to gambling, I'm opposed to 1) the state offering gambling monopolies, and 2) the fact that the slots bill was passed in the same unconstitutional manner as the pay raise. And I'm not opposed to free drinks, I'm opposed to 1) the state offering booze monopolies, 2) the state treating SOME of those monopolies differently than others, and 3) the fact that the bill was passed in the same unconstitutional manner as the pay raise.
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| |
| rdfs:comment
| - Just to clarify, I'm not opposed to gambling, I'm opposed to 1) the state offering gambling monopolies, and 2) the fact that the slots bill was passed in the same unconstitutional manner as the pay raise. And I'm not opposed to free drinks, I'm opposed to 1) the state offering booze monopolies, 2) the state treating SOME of those monopolies differently than others, and 3) the fact that the bill was passed in the same unconstitutional manner as the pay raise.
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| abstract
| - Just to clarify, I'm not opposed to gambling, I'm opposed to 1) the state offering gambling monopolies, and 2) the fact that the slots bill was passed in the same unconstitutional manner as the pay raise. And I'm not opposed to free drinks, I'm opposed to 1) the state offering booze monopolies, 2) the state treating SOME of those monopolies differently than others, and 3) the fact that the bill was passed in the same unconstitutional manner as the pay raise. Truth be told, on all of these issues, the state acts for one reason and one reason alone: Greed. If you're greedy, all you have to do is invest in a few choice legislators and then wait for the payoff. That is NOT what government should be.
|