Very narrow scope. Not enough people and not enough pages, can easily be covered in WP:WPMU. — Bill william comptonTalk 17:16, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
* Aren't these types of pages normally marked with (or something equivalent) and archived, rather than deleted? Peacock (talk) 19:56, 16 July 2012 (UTC) Not necessarily, e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. — Bill william comptonTalk 20:11, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
* I see. The project nominated here seems to have a similar lack of activity as the examples you've given that were deleted. Peacock (talk) 20:19, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
* Delete and nothing of value was lost. Gigs (talk) 13:22, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
* Delete Too narrow of a focus. Formed out of process. This has none of the "dressing" (templates, categories, etc.) and isn't mentioned o
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Annah Mac
|
| rdfs:comment
| - Very narrow scope. Not enough people and not enough pages, can easily be covered in WP:WPMU. — Bill william comptonTalk 17:16, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
* Aren't these types of pages normally marked with (or something equivalent) and archived, rather than deleted? Peacock (talk) 19:56, 16 July 2012 (UTC) Not necessarily, e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. — Bill william comptonTalk 20:11, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
* I see. The project nominated here seems to have a similar lack of activity as the examples you've given that were deleted. Peacock (talk) 20:19, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
* Delete and nothing of value was lost. Gigs (talk) 13:22, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
* Delete Too narrow of a focus. Formed out of process. This has none of the "dressing" (templates, categories, etc.) and isn't mentioned o
|
| dbkwik:speedydelet...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| abstract
| - Very narrow scope. Not enough people and not enough pages, can easily be covered in WP:WPMU. — Bill william comptonTalk 17:16, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
* Aren't these types of pages normally marked with (or something equivalent) and archived, rather than deleted? Peacock (talk) 19:56, 16 July 2012 (UTC) Not necessarily, e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. — Bill william comptonTalk 20:11, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
* I see. The project nominated here seems to have a similar lack of activity as the examples you've given that were deleted. Peacock (talk) 20:19, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
* Delete and nothing of value was lost. Gigs (talk) 13:22, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
* Delete Too narrow of a focus. Formed out of process. This has none of the "dressing" (templates, categories, etc.) and isn't mentioned on any of the pages in its scope, so deleting it will harm nothing. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:11, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)