About: Bully Wiki:Community Noticeboard/Archive 1

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Bully Wiki:Community Noticeboard/Archive 1 Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Ok these are my views. I think we need to come to an agreement and set block durations for offences. Now I was thinking that a first time block should only be for 24 hours to 3 days. Second time block should be for 1 week, Third time block should be for infinite. I think we should have a three strikes and then out rule here too. What is your opinions on this? Dan the Man 1983 05:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Bully Wiki:Community Noticeboard/Archive 1
rdfs:comment	Ok these are my views. I think we need to come to an agreement and set block durations for offences. Now I was thinking that a first time block should only be for 24 hours to 3 days. Second time block should be for 1 week, Third time block should be for infinite. I think we should have a three strikes and then out rule here too. What is your opinions on this? Dan the Man 1983 05:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
dcterms:subject	Bully Wiki
dbkwik:bully/prope...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/gxLaWx2mPILFAMlnQsOwfw==
abstract	Ok these are my views. I think we need to come to an agreement and set block durations for offences. Now I was thinking that a first time block should only be for 24 hours to 3 days. Second time block should be for 1 week, Third time block should be for infinite. I think we should have a three strikes and then out rule here too. What is your opinions on this? Dan the Man 1983 05:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC) Well, I see nothing wrong with your plan. It's really reasonable, in my opinion. TheKidInside 10:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC) Wikipedia says we're supposed to warn people once before blocking them, but I don't know that I care what wikipedia says. of course I'm also in favor of requiring registration to contribute, since at least 95% of IP contributions are vandalism. Depends on the offense but in general I agree with Dan. Also I'm starting to think that adding quotes to articles that don't need them can result in a block... but we probably ought to make a list of official rules. McJeff 17:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC) I think a warning is needed before a block. But it does depend on the offence. If some IP comes on and just deletes information on a character page with reason, then that is a straight block in my opinion, because it is blatant vandalism. I don't think adding anymore quotes is a copyright violation, since we have pictures of students on their pages taken from the official Bully website itself. However we made a rule here that is was 20 quotes a character page, 30 for Russell. I think we should make that a Bully Wiki policy. Dan the Man 1983 19:03, 31 October 2008 (UTC) I like the idea of making a list of rules for this Wiki. Dan the Man 1983 05:00, 1 November 2008 (UTC) There is a new Bully Wiki policy on blocking now. In all character pages that have the limit of 20 quotes, it states that editors do not add more because of possible copyright infringement. This also counts as a warning. So there is no need for a warning now when an editor adds a quote to characters who already have the limit, because there is no excuse to ignore the in text notices telling them not too. Instead a straight 24 hour block should be issued. Dan the Man 1983 09:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software