How does this card not belong to both Photon and Butterspy? Its in the name! Garr9988 (talk • contribs) 00:43, July 5, 2013 (UTC)garr9988
* The card is only member of the Photon archetype, and it is related to the Butterspy because it supports their archetype, but it needs to have "butterspy" in its name to also be considered member of such archetype. And if the admins consirer the trivia to be unnesesary, well... there's not much we can do about it... Kentaru Z (talk • contribs) 02:58, July 5, 2013 (UTC) To add onto that, trivia needs to be something worthwhile, something unknown, but true. We don't need trivia that a user can already see for themselves by reading the card. As for the archetype thing, Kentaru is right. It needs to have the Butterspy name to be considered part of th
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Card Trivia talk:Photon Alexandra Queen
|
| rdfs:comment
| - How does this card not belong to both Photon and Butterspy? Its in the name! Garr9988 (talk • contribs) 00:43, July 5, 2013 (UTC)garr9988
* The card is only member of the Photon archetype, and it is related to the Butterspy because it supports their archetype, but it needs to have "butterspy" in its name to also be considered member of such archetype. And if the admins consirer the trivia to be unnesesary, well... there's not much we can do about it... Kentaru Z (talk • contribs) 02:58, July 5, 2013 (UTC) To add onto that, trivia needs to be something worthwhile, something unknown, but true. We don't need trivia that a user can already see for themselves by reading the card. As for the archetype thing, Kentaru is right. It needs to have the Butterspy name to be considered part of th
|
| dbkwik:yugi-oh/pro...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dbkwik:yugioh/prop...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| abstract
| - How does this card not belong to both Photon and Butterspy? Its in the name! Garr9988 (talk • contribs) 00:43, July 5, 2013 (UTC)garr9988
* The card is only member of the Photon archetype, and it is related to the Butterspy because it supports their archetype, but it needs to have "butterspy" in its name to also be considered member of such archetype. And if the admins consirer the trivia to be unnesesary, well... there's not much we can do about it... Kentaru Z (talk • contribs) 02:58, July 5, 2013 (UTC) To add onto that, trivia needs to be something worthwhile, something unknown, but true. We don't need trivia that a user can already see for themselves by reading the card. As for the archetype thing, Kentaru is right. It needs to have the Butterspy name to be considered part of the Butterspy archetype. --Dark Ace SP (Talk) 03:43, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)