About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Prima donna   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

This one is quite encyclopedic. Too factual? Not funny enough? Too short? Just right? Advice welcome. ~ 10:54, July 21, 2011 (UTC) Sure. Please don't be insulted if it takes me max two days. -- 15:34, July 26, 2011 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Prima donna
rdfs:comment
  • This one is quite encyclopedic. Too factual? Not funny enough? Too short? Just right? Advice welcome. ~ 10:54, July 21, 2011 (UTC) Sure. Please don't be insulted if it takes me max two days. -- 15:34, July 26, 2011 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
Mcomment
  • So this article feels like it could be worth nominating on VFH. It's not my type of humour, but I think that it would fit the style of most of the users here. Sleep on it, work it a little bit and see if it's good enough for VFH.
Pcomment
  • Yea, didn't notice any spelling errors or grammar problems, so cudos to you there. Format wise, the only thing I can see wrong is that timeline of Prima Donna. Maybe place it first in the article? Or something, it seems a little out f place, but it is not that big of a deal.
Icomment
  • So your use of images is pretty good here. It seems like they are placed perfectly and there is just the right amount of them. One thing I had a little issue with was the caption in that first picture, "Sex icon or street person? Flip a coin." I'm not sure, but to me, this seemed a little weak. I have a feeling that may just be me and since I can't really think of anything better to insert, I'll leave the decision of acting on it up to you.
Pscore
  • 9(xsd:integer)
Ccomment
  • It is an interesting concept, not new, but a little fresh and unique, especially through your manner of approaching it. However, it is a little one sided in regards to just talking about people whoring themselves. Than again, I feel like there are many different ways you could approach this article. You took a good route, although I feel like you could have inserted some more into the article like the recently growing stereotype of the "powerful black woman" or even talk about Brittany Spears or about some more celebrities instead of just Madonna and Paula Abdula.
Cscore
  • 7(xsd:double)
Mscore
  • 8(xsd:integer)
Hcomment
  • 129600.0
Iscore
  • 8(xsd:double)
Hscore
  • 7(xsd:double)
Fcomment
  • Any questions, comments, etc. can be left on my talkpage. That's right, I give you permission to visit my talkpage, but not for too long or else I'll set the dogs on you. Not really, haha, they're more like cougars than dogs. Anyways, hope you're in shape, cheers.
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
Signature
  • --07-30
abstract
  • This one is quite encyclopedic. Too factual? Not funny enough? Too short? Just right? Advice welcome. ~ 10:54, July 21, 2011 (UTC) Sure. Please don't be insulted if it takes me max two days. -- 15:34, July 26, 2011 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software