About: Star Wars Fanon:The Sixth Wiki Awards   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Alright boys and girls, ladies and gentlemen, children and old people, beauties and beasts, it's time for the Sixth Star Wars Fanon Wiki Awards! And now, here are your hosts: the one and only Darth Wylind and the stunning and amazingly talented Trak Nar, who also has a friggin' sweet hat! I know you're all anxious to begin, but hold on, little doggies! We've got a schedule to review: January 9–February 6: Nominations period. Nominate articles now! February 6–February 20: Voting period. February 20: Winners announced! When nominating, be sure to remember...

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Star Wars Fanon:The Sixth Wiki Awards
rdfs:comment
  • Alright boys and girls, ladies and gentlemen, children and old people, beauties and beasts, it's time for the Sixth Star Wars Fanon Wiki Awards! And now, here are your hosts: the one and only Darth Wylind and the stunning and amazingly talented Trak Nar, who also has a friggin' sweet hat! I know you're all anxious to begin, but hold on, little doggies! We've got a schedule to review: January 9–February 6: Nominations period. Nominate articles now! February 6–February 20: Voting period. February 20: Winners announced! When nominating, be sure to remember...
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:swfanon/pro...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Alright boys and girls, ladies and gentlemen, children and old people, beauties and beasts, it's time for the Sixth Star Wars Fanon Wiki Awards! And now, here are your hosts: the one and only Darth Wylind and the stunning and amazingly talented Trak Nar, who also has a friggin' sweet hat! I know you're all anxious to begin, but hold on, little doggies! We've got a schedule to review: January 9–February 6: Nominations period. Nominate articles now! February 6–February 20: Voting period. February 20: Winners announced! When nominating, be sure to remember... * When you nominate an article, it doesn't have to be of novel length. Length does not necessary equal quality, and vice-a-versa. The Wiki Awards is about quality. Short articles can be awesome, too. Show them some love. * As well, you don't have to nominate good articles and/or featured articles. Just because an article isn't well-known or hasn't been recognized doesn't mean it's not good. Note: This is not to say not to nominate long articles or GAs/FAs, but not to limit yourself to them. * When nominating for best author, that doesn't mean the most well-known author or the author that has/have churned out the most articles. It is for the best. Keep that in mind. Be non-biased. Suck-ups will be shot. Just kidding...or are we? Thanks to Solus for coming up with those tips a couple years ago and for allowing us to use them again and again. So, let's do this! Oh, wait, what? Right, the rules. File:Rolleyes.gif
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software