About: RuneScape:Requests for adminship/Skill   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

We've had some good discussions in recent requests for bureaucrat, and that's a good sign. It's good for us to take our time, to be careful and deliberate about important decisions. It raises the credibility of our decision making, and goes a long way to solidifying the professionalism of the Wiki. I appreciate your work here Skill, and I know others do as well. Good luck! Endasil (Talk) @ 02:21, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape:Requests for adminship/Skill
rdfs:comment
  • We've had some good discussions in recent requests for bureaucrat, and that's a good sign. It's good for us to take our time, to be careful and deliberate about important decisions. It raises the credibility of our decision making, and goes a long way to solidifying the professionalism of the Wiki. I appreciate your work here Skill, and I know others do as well. Good luck! Endasil (Talk) @ 02:21, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • We've had some good discussions in recent requests for bureaucrat, and that's a good sign. It's good for us to take our time, to be careful and deliberate about important decisions. It raises the credibility of our decision making, and goes a long way to solidifying the professionalism of the Wiki. We have, however, failed to produce a new bureaucrat. I believe as much as ever that we need at least two active bureaucrats; both to cover each others' absences and to keep each other accountable. It is for this reason that I am nominating Skill for bureaucrat. I was planning on doing this a couple of weeks ago, but I felt it was important to only have one RfB on the go at a time. When I was searching the list of administrators to see who would serve as a good bureaucrat, Skill instantly took my eye. For me, he is the obvious choice. Skill has continually been a source of fair judgment and neutrality. He takes an extremely active stance on administrative affairs (community processes, Mediawiki, etc), and is graced with quite an impressive technical know-how. I can honestly say that I have never seen another user take exception with anything Skill has either said or done, neither on the Wiki nor on IRC. He respects all users, knows when to lead, and knows when to be passive. I appreciate your work here Skill, and I know others do as well. Good luck! Endasil (Talk) @ 02:21, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software