About: WoWWiki talk:Vandalism policy/Archive01   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Not sure if this is where we can start our discussion on definition of a Vandal? But here goes: * Definition of a Vandal - repeated acts of edits making non-sense, errors and blatant advertisements (1 pixel ads) admissions. --Dracomage 16:13, 7 Dec 2005 (EST)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • WoWWiki talk:Vandalism policy/Archive01
rdfs:comment
  • Not sure if this is where we can start our discussion on definition of a Vandal? But here goes: * Definition of a Vandal - repeated acts of edits making non-sense, errors and blatant advertisements (1 pixel ads) admissions. --Dracomage 16:13, 7 Dec 2005 (EST)
dbkwik:wowwiki/pro...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Not sure if this is where we can start our discussion on definition of a Vandal? But here goes: * Definition of a Vandal - repeated acts of edits making non-sense, errors and blatant advertisements (1 pixel ads) admissions. --Dracomage 16:13, 7 Dec 2005 (EST) Ahhah! The definition of a vandal! Fits me perfectly, that's why I am on the known vandals list of course! WTF am I on there... I have done nothing but further this community, I vene *created* this page! ℑilver§ℑide 16:31, 7 Dec 2005 (EST) P.S. That sounds good - I would also add something about the three revert rule, and multiple violations (1 viol, they get warned on the talk page in a nice manner, 2 viol., they are warned again in a stern *very clear* manner just incase it didn't get across the first time, 3 viol. they are added to the WoWWiki:Known vandals, and 4 viol. they are banned by IP), and something about sheer quantity of edits too... I think K-Bot edits should automatically warrant a ban. Period. Definition of K-Bot ban? edits starting with < div id="wikiNUMBER" style="overflow:auto; height: 1px; " > where number is any number - anybody agree? -- ℑilver§ℑide 13:24, 5 Jan 2006 The policy is written in such a way that these bots should get banned pretty quickly, but we could put a much lower threshold for bots that are obviously bots. Maybe after 5 changes? I'm not sure we should special case too much. --Fandyllic 7:11 PM PST 9 Jan 2006
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software