| abstract
| - Reason: Forgot some background between his legs, filled up the notorious "tooth", removed some AA artefacts, smoothened a bit.
* Support - As nom. 15:38, August 14, 2010 (UTC) I know, there is the destruct avatar again, but you were so "annoyed" by the tooth, i decided to get rid of it, and then also some other bad things too. left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 15:38, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
* Support - per nom User:LordDarkPhantom/Signature 15:50, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
* Support - Per nom. The accursed tooth is gone! File:Mining cape.png The Last Pun Talk File:Aberrant Spectre Champion.png 20:03, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
* Support - Do we really need another one, considering the past one just got done and this is only a minor change. 04:36, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
* Support - Agreeing with Halo, but if you went through the effort to do it again, no reason to not accept this I suppose? :s File:Quest point cape detail.png Texan H B K File:Quest point cape detail.png 10:49, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Reconsidered per Chess
* Neutral - I'll support if you bring the tooth back. It looks so cool! Fswe1 11:30, August 15, 2010 (UTC) So that means support for the edges and removed background, oppose for the cleaned tooth? left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 00:56, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
* Strong Oppose - Wait, so the original image actually had the tooth, and you removed it by means of editing? That makes it fan art. bad_fetustalk 13:00, August 15, 2010 (UTC) I did edit it out, but the tooth is a bad thing about the image, and it is impossible to have both a good angle and not the "tooth", so i edited it out. I said "Maybe some pro photoshopper can remove it or something" the prev nomination, and nobody protested, so that's why i did it. Btw, it also has no AA artefacts and no background between his legs. Maybe you could still support for that, if you think it is fan art. I still think this is no fan art as only a VERY small part of it has been edited away, as it is ugly.(File:Ghost (monster).png is also fan art then, as the trans wasn't in it at the time of the screenshot. it was added later.) And can't you allow it for one time, because you don't see anything about it if you don't know it is edited. left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 16:43, August 15, 2010 (UTC) File:Ghost (monster).png is not fan art, because it looks exactly the same with the in-game image. However, this image, is different from the way it should be. Just be bold and fix the transparency, without removing the tooth. Also, as far as I can remember, altering images is against the rules. bad_fetustalk 08:38, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
* Oppose - The previous just won a nomination. The appliance of removing something from it shouldn't be done in my opinion. I don't see anything wrong with leaving the "unsightly" tooth there. Adding transparency is allowing the main article in the image to be focused on, this tooth wasn't something that needed to be taken away. I do not oppose because I would think it could be fan art, but because of what has been stated and what purpose does it truthfully serves. I also think that the tooth made him more believable than his more "gummy" (he doesn't bite, he'll just gum you to death) grin in aforementioned file. On another note, the Avatar appears to have lost some colour in the edit. Ryan PM 05:14, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Did you just say it is allowed to remove background, and smoothen edges with FIMGS? left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 13:39, August 16, 2010 (UTC) If one is aiming to have an image of Monster X, then the background around Monster X must be removed. The background around Monster X is not Monster X, and thus, is irrelevant to the image. Smoothing images' edges is fine because it does not remove relevant content from the image, it only make the edges look nicer than usual jagged pixels. Removing a whole tooth from a monster's mouth gives the monster a false image, something it is not. 18:13, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Then i've now already uploaded the no background, smooth edge version, with tooth, and there should be consensus about removing the tooth. left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 07:31, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
* Oppose - Without the tooth, the mouth looks odd. RuneScape imagery should not be altered to what it isn't in-game. The tooth belongs. 07:22, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
* Comment - This replacement should be redone because the voters were voting for smooth edges and fixed trans, and not just the tooth. This is why you shouldn't upload halfway during a nomination. User:LordDarkPhantom/Signature 17:46, August 17, 2010 (UTC) The image was not uploading correctly, and then i thought of that too, so didn't re-upload to fix it. If it did upload correctly for you, please revert for now, so the discussion doesn't have to be started over Again left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 00:56, August 19, 2010 (UTC) Why should I do this when you have nominated it, and then you uploaded during a nomination? Whenever I see a nom I always zoom in to see the image and it is updated correctly when you see that. The voters near the top don't even know that the ONLY thing they are voting for is the tooth since you went ahead and did all the other things such as: "Forgot some background between his legs, filled up the notorious "tooth", removed some AA artefacts, smoothened a bit." This should make them re-vote as there vote no longer counts since they though they were voting for more changes. I have two suggestions: restart the nomination or put over the votes cast BEFORE you uploaded the changes, stating a reason, and ask the voters to re-vote. This is not about the future voters as you seem to think it is, but the voters who voted before the change. User:LordDarkPhantom/Signature 07:04, August 19, 2010 (UTC) I reverted it, so this discussion doesn't have to be started over again... left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 14:25, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
* Strong oppose - Per Chess. --Coolnesse 03:11, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
* Slight support - Slight improvement although it shouldn't be edited to remove a part of monster that should be there or has not been glitched. If there was a weird gap/transparent part of the head (yes I have seen this before) then filling it doesn't seem wrong. User:LordDarkPhantom/Signature 07:04, August 19, 2010 (UTC) You mean images like: [1], [2], [3]? left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 14:25, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
* Strong oppose - Per chess. 222 talk 07:16, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
* Neutral - Per Chess, you made some improvements, but the tooth is part of the monster and should be kept. File:Mining cape.png The Last Pun Talk File:Aberrant Spectre Champion.png 15:12, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
* Closed - File:X mark.svg Nomination is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 05:44, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)