About: Club Penguin Fan Universe:Court House/Video game articles   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Is restricting people from making video game articles really necessary? I hear from Alex that it is because there are too many of them, lets have a look at a few things; * Despite what everyone is saying at the moment, the Games category is actually one of the smallest. There are 125 character articles, and 227 penguin articles, while there are only 43 game articles at the moment. * If a category becomes popular, I believe we should encourage people to make the respective articles, not ridicule them. * Making video game articles does not violate COC. * It restricts users even further. To build a sucessful community, trust is a biggie. If users feel that they cannot write what they like, the question "Why am I at a Fanon Wiki if I can't write what I want" comes into mind.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Club Penguin Fan Universe:Court House/Video game articles
rdfs:comment
  • Is restricting people from making video game articles really necessary? I hear from Alex that it is because there are too many of them, lets have a look at a few things; * Despite what everyone is saying at the moment, the Games category is actually one of the smallest. There are 125 character articles, and 227 penguin articles, while there are only 43 game articles at the moment. * If a category becomes popular, I believe we should encourage people to make the respective articles, not ridicule them. * Making video game articles does not violate COC. * It restricts users even further. To build a sucessful community, trust is a biggie. If users feel that they cannot write what they like, the question "Why am I at a Fanon Wiki if I can't write what I want" comes into mind.
dbkwik:clubpenguin...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:clubpenguin...iPageUsesTemplate
Page
  • Video game articles
Type
  • Wiki Organization
Action
  • allowed freedom of speech
abstract
  • Is restricting people from making video game articles really necessary? I hear from Alex that it is because there are too many of them, lets have a look at a few things; * Despite what everyone is saying at the moment, the Games category is actually one of the smallest. There are 125 character articles, and 227 penguin articles, while there are only 43 game articles at the moment. * If a category becomes popular, I believe we should encourage people to make the respective articles, not ridicule them. * Making video game articles does not violate COC. * It restricts users even further. To build a sucessful community, trust is a biggie. If users feel that they cannot write what they like, the question "Why am I at a Fanon Wiki if I can't write what I want" comes into mind. I'm not making anyone feel bad, or trying to point fingers at people, but its starting to get out of hand. The COC/That's Death already has too many rules as it is, so we really shouldn't try to fit in anymore. Image:PogoPunk32.png (Talk to me!)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software