| abstract
| - Delete: replaced with Image:CactuarRoot.png --Eleri 18:20, 18 May 2007 (CDT) Delete: Duplicate image. --18:23, 18 May 2007 (CDT) Image:CactuarRoot.png vs [[Image:Cactuar root.jpg]] 16KB vs 14KB The replacement is bigger. Why was it replaced? This whole anti-.jpg thing is getting out of control. The picture should only be replace if it fails the Image Policy or the replacement is clearly superior. This pic clearly does not fail the image policy, and its replacement is not noticably superior. -- 10:41, 24 May 2007 (CDT) Comment: This whole copy/paste thing is getting annoying, the JPG version is transparent, and thusly fails the image policy. -- 11:37, 24 May 2007 (CDT) Comment: I agree with Mierin that this whole PNG vs. JPG replacement thing is getting out of hand, but the PNG in this case is better. In the JPG you can see through the transparent background and see a structure of some kind. In my opinion, the JPG did not fail the requirements - it's hardly noticeable that it is transparent, but since the PNG is here, let's use it. I am in favor on PNG images, but there is nothing wrong with using JPGs, especially when they are smaller in size. -- 11:39, 24 May 2007 (CDT) Comment: I never said I didn't agree, I'm just saying there are some PNG replacements that are worth keeping, Mierin was pasting the same thing on every talk page. 1.
* Image:CactuarRoot.png version of this is superior because of transparency. 2.
* Image:BoltBelt.png version is superior because it's a more up-to-date image (RE: fully charged blue text) 3.
* Image:BayAquarium.png needs verification because the two descriptions are completely different, one of them is outdated. 4.
* [[:Image:ChaosGauntletsPlus1.png]] version is superior because the JPG's font is grossly distorted and blurry. My two cents. -- 11:46, 24 May 2007 (CDT) Comment: yes, I am copy and pasting the same thing because my comments are the same. If you will notice, I've actually done a Speedy Delete on about 80% of the pics so far, and these few I did not agree with the replacement immediately so they got my comment, and I will continue to do so with ones that I don't feel should get a speedy delete. So, I'm sorry if it is "annoying," but it is what it is. Maybe next time you should justify your delete comment better than "Duplicate image," because to me, a duplicate image isn't a good enough reason. I'm going to place the two next to each other, and if I don't agree that the duplicate is better, I'm giving my stock response. You don't want a stock response, justify your reason for delete better. Looking at this jpg, I cannot see the transparency. It could be my bad work monitor. But if it was tranparent, then that should have been the comment for why it was deleted, rather than, "replaced with". -- 11:58, 24 May 2007 (CDT) Comment: Well, my detailed explanation is right above your comment. Adding in one more as well. -- 12:21, 24 May 2007 (CDT) Comment: Pandoraxero here, I would like to state that under NO CIRCUMSTANCES would anyone in my circle (or lack thereof) upload a larger image unless there is an obvious flaw in the previous image. in this case, i would like to point out that the smaller of the 2 images above DOES exhibit transparency. HOWEVER, there is no reason a PNG replacement for any item description should be any larger than 32K. I say this out of experience and having worked with hundreds and hundreds of PNG item descriptions. this image, while it DOES meet the img policy standards, is simply too large in terms of filesize relative to image size. if necessary and/or requested i can upload a smaller PNG replacement. --Pandora Xero, Destroyer of ovesized images 13:10, 24 May 2007 (CDT) Comment - Followup: I have a replacement capture for the PNG version thats 15664 bytes, using background 6 --Pandora Xero, Destroyer of ovesized images 13:26, 24 May 2007 (CDT) Comment - Addendum: If this is an acceptable difference in size, comment below, and i'll upload. --Pandora Xero, Destroyer of ovesized images 13:35, 24 May 2007 (CDT) Resolution: Delete per Pandoraxero -- 14:06, 24 May 2007 (CDT)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)