About: Wotwiki:Consensus   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

They have a Consensus guideline for decision-making: decisions should involve as much input as possible, and take into account dissenting views in order to make the end result a better decision. Contrast this with majority voting. Feel free to add additional proposals, or additions/modifications to mine. However, sign any changes, so that people who voted before you can make an informed decision about your changes. Also, we don't have 5 users yet, but I'll be posting this to some of the people who have expressed an interest in the project. nae'blis (talk) 17:30, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Wotwiki:Consensus
rdfs:comment
  • They have a Consensus guideline for decision-making: decisions should involve as much input as possible, and take into account dissenting views in order to make the end result a better decision. Contrast this with majority voting. Feel free to add additional proposals, or additions/modifications to mine. However, sign any changes, so that people who voted before you can make an informed decision about your changes. Also, we don't have 5 users yet, but I'll be posting this to some of the people who have expressed an interest in the project. nae'blis (talk) 17:30, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
dbkwik:wot/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • They have a Consensus guideline for decision-making: decisions should involve as much input as possible, and take into account dissenting views in order to make the end result a better decision. Contrast this with majority voting. Here at My English Wiki, we need to come up with a similar set of guidelines to manage our day-to-day business. Some matters will not require a group decision at all (editing article information, categorizing articles and building new pages), some will be better served by group input (deleting pages, for example, could be one of these), and some should require some sort of formal decision-making process before being instituted (changes to , for example). The first such decision, ironically, is how to decide these matters. As a start, we'll utilize Wikipedia:Approval voting to narrow the field of possibilities; you may support as many options as you like, and the one with the greatest number of supporters at the end of November 2005 will be what we go with. If two are close, we'll revise and try again. Anybody have a problem with that? Feel free to add additional proposals, or additions/modifications to mine. However, sign any changes, so that people who voted before you can make an informed decision about your changes. Also, we don't have 5 users yet, but I'll be posting this to some of the people who have expressed an interest in the project. nae'blis (talk) 17:30, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC) If you think Nae'blis' three initial proposals may be needlessly complex (read: scary!) ... give simple majority a good look :) --Gherald 03:12, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software