About: RuneScape:Editor Review/Chessmaster   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Hi, I've been around a while, and have been wondering what people think about me. bad_fetustalk 21:36, April 13, 2010 (UTC) Your recent contributions have been frankly, awesome. Scrolling down the Recent created non-talk pages section of your edit report I was amazed at how many articles you have created since the dungeoneering update recently. You don't seem to be lacking in many areas, although a few more anti-vandalism edits never hurt anyone (Except the vandals of course). Ruud (talk)(Suggest me naems) 18:07, April 22, 2010 (UTC) I agree; while you do have a large percent in the user talk space, your 1,000 mainspace edits are impressive. Beyond the meaningless statistic of an editcount, I also appreciate the mature attitude that you bring to the forums, and your general willingness t

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape:Editor Review/Chessmaster
rdfs:comment
  • Hi, I've been around a while, and have been wondering what people think about me. bad_fetustalk 21:36, April 13, 2010 (UTC) Your recent contributions have been frankly, awesome. Scrolling down the Recent created non-talk pages section of your edit report I was amazed at how many articles you have created since the dungeoneering update recently. You don't seem to be lacking in many areas, although a few more anti-vandalism edits never hurt anyone (Except the vandals of course). Ruud (talk)(Suggest me naems) 18:07, April 22, 2010 (UTC) I agree; while you do have a large percent in the user talk space, your 1,000 mainspace edits are impressive. Beyond the meaningless statistic of an editcount, I also appreciate the mature attitude that you bring to the forums, and your general willingness t
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Hi, I've been around a while, and have been wondering what people think about me. bad_fetustalk 21:36, April 13, 2010 (UTC) Your recent contributions have been frankly, awesome. Scrolling down the Recent created non-talk pages section of your edit report I was amazed at how many articles you have created since the dungeoneering update recently. You don't seem to be lacking in many areas, although a few more anti-vandalism edits never hurt anyone (Except the vandals of course). Ruud (talk)(Suggest me naems) 18:07, April 22, 2010 (UTC) I agree; while you do have a large percent in the user talk space, your 1,000 mainspace edits are impressive. Beyond the meaningless statistic of an editcount, I also appreciate the mature attitude that you bring to the forums, and your general willingness to try out new ideas (from what I've seen). Great work :) Ajraddatz Talk 18:09, April 22, 2010 (UTC) In the past, I felt like I never saw much of you (apart from CC). Although now, I'm beginning to see much more, in the RC and the YG. File:Wink.svg 15:33, April 25, 2010 (UTC) You're doing a brilliant job! The only criticism I have is that alot of your edits are a bit meaningless, it's just copy and pasting the same sentences onto pages, you get the job done by making these pages but try adding that little bit extra to it because it looks like you edit to get a high count, not for the sake of helping people, but I know this isn't true, 'cauz u iz leet. 19:26, April 26, 2010 (UTC) Your edits are good. I saw that you were the one who created many of the Dungeoneering item articles. File:Smile.gif I should note that you're not the most active anti-vandal user out there, but then again, we do have plenty of those already. My last complaint is that you use a blasphemous god in your signature and welcome notice. Try this one instead. File:XD.gif --LiquidTalk 19:17, April 30, 2010 (UTC) Sara epic phails D: bad_fetustalk 19:20, April 30, 2010 (UTC) Your doing well, keep up the good work *mutters about heretics*. Jack You do have a somewhat higher user talk percentage than some, but I can't complain about that — You do very good work in the mainspace, and I'm over 50% userspace myself from testing templates and scripts. Also, great job on your worship of Zamorak *mutters about Saradominists who have bad grammar* I'm a regular user and I approve this message. TLUL Talk - Contribs 14:48, May 4, 2010 (UTC) Hey Chess. When I reflect on you, you stand out as a good contributor and an active member of the wiki. You have your strengths that the wiki really appreciates. I haven't really seen to much that strikes me as "Wow" and I'm not going to say your perfect because that means there is no room to grow. The wiki appreciates your presence. Thank you. Bonziiznob Talk 21:08, May 8, 2010 (UTC) Well, I haven't seen a lot of edits you made, but they're definitely horrible and Zammy sucks!. Uhm... what I meant to say is that the contributions I díd saw were very well. So keep up the good work (but switch to Guthix File:Smile.gif)! File:^ ^.gif Oh, and I have proof on our talk pages that you are quite insane, which is also great! Fswe1 16:40, May 11, 2010 (UTC) Closed - Due to inactivity for two weeks. C.ChiamTalk 05:02, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software