From major policy changes to minor War Room discussions, the Ghost Recon Wiki operates by consensus. This method of settlement is different from a "majority rules" system; in a consensus, the best possible resolution that the two (or more) viewpoints can achieve at the time is taken. Most issues are mediated by an administrator, who will determine what the consensus is by considering points made by both sides of the argument. When a consensus cannot be reached in a voting process, such as a request for adminship, a rough consensus of 70% of the votes should be used to determine the outcome.
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Ghost Recon Wiki:Consensus
|
| rdfs:comment
| - From major policy changes to minor War Room discussions, the Ghost Recon Wiki operates by consensus. This method of settlement is different from a "majority rules" system; in a consensus, the best possible resolution that the two (or more) viewpoints can achieve at the time is taken. Most issues are mediated by an administrator, who will determine what the consensus is by considering points made by both sides of the argument. When a consensus cannot be reached in a voting process, such as a request for adminship, a rough consensus of 70% of the votes should be used to determine the outcome.
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| abstract
| - From major policy changes to minor War Room discussions, the Ghost Recon Wiki operates by consensus. This method of settlement is different from a "majority rules" system; in a consensus, the best possible resolution that the two (or more) viewpoints can achieve at the time is taken. Most issues are mediated by an administrator, who will determine what the consensus is by considering points made by both sides of the argument. When a consensus cannot be reached in a voting process, such as a request for adminship, a rough consensus of 70% of the votes should be used to determine the outcome.
|