About: RuneScape:Featured articles/Ullek (delist)   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

There is hardly any known information on the location, and it also lacks images. I personally have never been to the city, but there are no images of the inside!!! Not even OOO images of secret locations. Also the watersource there, what is that? I don't see an image. Sure, it give a nice brief history lesson, but many questions still exist. Jagex is bound to update the area! Such a large area has to be updated, and and article like this should not be AOTM.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape:Featured articles/Ullek (delist)
rdfs:comment
  • There is hardly any known information on the location, and it also lacks images. I personally have never been to the city, but there are no images of the inside!!! Not even OOO images of secret locations. Also the watersource there, what is that? I don't see an image. Sure, it give a nice brief history lesson, but many questions still exist. Jagex is bound to update the area! Such a large area has to be updated, and and article like this should not be AOTM.
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • There is hardly any known information on the location, and it also lacks images. I personally have never been to the city, but there are no images of the inside!!! Not even OOO images of secret locations. Also the watersource there, what is that? I don't see an image. Sure, it give a nice brief history lesson, but many questions still exist. Jagex is bound to update the area! Such a large area has to be updated, and and article like this should not be AOTM. * Support - as nominator <a href="http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af290/porp109/sig1.png">http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af290/porp109/sig1.png</a> Spam me w/ lolcatsFile:Pottery statuette detail.png Is awesome? I don't know, let me check... 17:44, March 14, 2010 (UTC) * Oppose - What are you talking about? This is a great article. --Coolnesse 17:49, March 14, 2010 (UTC) * Oppose - I agree with Coolnesse. This article is nothing short of brilliance. The history section is longer than any other town article, and it's one of the most informative there is. File:Silver sickle.png Asparagoose 23:46, March 14, 2010 (UTC) * Oppose - I think that this article is what we should be aspiring for with all ruins articles. Since you were wondering, this is what Ullek is like now. I think this is a great article to showcase. File:Unicorn horn dust.png Evil Yanks talk 06:23, March 15, 2010 (UTC) * Oppose - He hasn't been in Ullek. The article is extremely good. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cmunz (talk) on 00:59, March 17, 2010. * Oppose - This article is great! There's not much to say about Ullek, but this article says everything that we know about the old town. File:Ancient talisman.png Oil4 Talk 12:54, March 27, 2010 (UTC) * Closed - Ullek will be kept a featured article at this time. 01:03, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software