About: RuneScape Players Wiki:Consensus   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Consensus can be reached through the process of editing, or through discussion. After someone chooses to make a change to a page, others may choose to leave it or change it. When editors cannot achieve consensus by editing, they can try to discuss the change and seek a compromise. A consensus decision takes into consideration all the points raised in a discussion. However, there are certain mistakes made by editors when trying to achieve consensus:

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape Players Wiki:Consensus
rdfs:comment
  • Consensus can be reached through the process of editing, or through discussion. After someone chooses to make a change to a page, others may choose to leave it or change it. When editors cannot achieve consensus by editing, they can try to discuss the change and seek a compromise. A consensus decision takes into consideration all the points raised in a discussion. However, there are certain mistakes made by editors when trying to achieve consensus:
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:rsplayers/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Consensus can be reached through the process of editing, or through discussion. After someone chooses to make a change to a page, others may choose to leave it or change it. When editors cannot achieve consensus by editing, they can try to discuss the change and seek a compromise. A consensus decision takes into consideration all the points raised in a discussion. In a consensus discussion, editors try to persuade others using reasons based on policy and common sense. They may also suggest alternatives that may satisfy all concerns. The result might be an agreement that does not satisfy anyone completely, but that everyone recognises as a reasonable solution. However, there are certain mistakes made by editors when trying to achieve consensus: * Canvassing. Gathering Wikians to participate in a discussion in order to bias it is unacceptable. It is fine to notify editors of a discussion; just remember to keep the notifications neutral, and do not preselect editors based on their personal preferences. * Sock puppetry. Using another account to try and influence a certain point of view is unacceptable, and is considered disruptive to the consensus building process. * Incivility. Trying to be rude or aggressive to get users to agree with you particular viewpoint should be avoided. Instead, try to be polite and cooperate with other editors to build better articles.
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software