About: Brickipedia:BAG/Blocking unapproved bot accounts

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Brickipedia:BAG/Blocking unapproved bot accounts Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

__NEWSECTIONLINK__ We have a few unapproved bots floating around, and I was just thinking, would it be worth perma blocking them until they are approved, just to stop them being run? Just a suggestion.. --Lcawte 20:17, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Brickipedia:BAG/Blocking unapproved bot accounts
rdfs:comment	__NEWSECTIONLINK__ We have a few unapproved bots floating around, and I was just thinking, would it be worth perma blocking them until they are approved, just to stop them being run? Just a suggestion.. --Lcawte 20:17, April 17, 2010 (UTC)
dbkwik:lego/proper...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/k0gaBR3lrj0-bN-mgTad7g== dbkwik:resource/rS9acxicHDertnHRuna1uw==
abstract	__NEWSECTIONLINK__ We have a few unapproved bots floating around, and I was just thinking, would it be worth perma blocking them until they are approved, just to stop them being run? Just a suggestion.. --Lcawte 20:17, April 17, 2010 (UTC) * Umm which ones? From Special:Listusers, I can see 8 bots, 3 of which have apparently never edited, the 3 approved bot, one staff bot which doesn't appear to funciton anymore, and the auto-welcome bot. I know the page takes some time to update though 00:00, April 18, 2010 (UTC) * These are pretty old ones, but the ones I remember are like.. CloneComanderCodyBot, oh and I cant remember the others.. but theres one or two more out there.. --Lcawte 22:17, April 23, 2010 (UTC) He means that ones that don't have the bot flag. Ajraddatz Talk 22:20, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software