About: Forum:SH Archive/Another Hope   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Not only does Wikipedia have a page for Another Hope, they voted to keep it. On the other hand, I'm reluctant to have a detailed page for something like this. Should we transwiki it, or not? -LtNOWIS 16:24, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Forum:SH Archive/Another Hope
rdfs:comment
  • Not only does Wikipedia have a page for Another Hope, they voted to keep it. On the other hand, I'm reluctant to have a detailed page for something like this. Should we transwiki it, or not? -LtNOWIS 16:24, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:starwars/pr...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Not only does Wikipedia have a page for Another Hope, they voted to keep it. On the other hand, I'm reluctant to have a detailed page for something like this. Should we transwiki it, or not? -LtNOWIS 16:24, 29 April 2006 (UTC) * I'd say yes. It seems high-profile enough, being (as far as I'm aware) the only time somehtign like this happened, and gainign exposure with NPR doing a story on it. Kuralyov 18:07, 29 April 2006 (UTC) * I agree, notable enough for a single article here. (And no, anonymous prankster who may be lurking, we're not doing an article on Rise of the Dark Falls. 8) )—Silly Dan (talk) 18:10, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software