About: Stephen Hawking/Featured   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Stephen Hawking is a theoretical physicist of mediocre esteem. Really, a "theoretical" physicist? I'm sure that'll win us a lot of "theoretical" wars. The other physicists only let him hang around with them out of pity since he's in a wheelchair, although it's largely agreed that Hawking is probably faking the whole cripple thing anyway. Hawking claims he suffers from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig's disease. If this were true, wouldn't it be called Stephen Hawking disease? I can't believe no one's called him out on this one yet. -GR Conference website

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Stephen Hawking/Featured
rdfs:comment
  • Stephen Hawking is a theoretical physicist of mediocre esteem. Really, a "theoretical" physicist? I'm sure that'll win us a lot of "theoretical" wars. The other physicists only let him hang around with them out of pity since he's in a wheelchair, although it's largely agreed that Hawking is probably faking the whole cripple thing anyway. Hawking claims he suffers from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig's disease. If this were true, wouldn't it be called Stephen Hawking disease? I can't believe no one's called him out on this one yet. -GR Conference website
dbkwik:wikiality/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Stephen Hawking is a theoretical physicist of mediocre esteem. Really, a "theoretical" physicist? I'm sure that'll win us a lot of "theoretical" wars. The other physicists only let him hang around with them out of pity since he's in a wheelchair, although it's largely agreed that Hawking is probably faking the whole cripple thing anyway. Hawking claims he suffers from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig's disease. If this were true, wouldn't it be called Stephen Hawking disease? I can't believe no one's called him out on this one yet. A typical lecture by Hawking has been summarized as follows: The Euclidean path integral over all topologically trivial metrics can be done by time slicing and so is unitary when analytically continued to the Lorentzian. On the other hand, the path integral over all topologically non-trivial metrics is asymptotically independent of the initial state. Thus the total path integral is unitary and information is not lost in the formation and evaporation of black holes. The way the information gets out seems to be that a true event horizon never forms, just an apparent horizon. -GR Conference website Whatever, bitch. Jesus, what an asshole. By the way, where does this guy get off "lecturing" us in the first place? What could YOU possibly lecture ME about? It sure isn't walking. Thankfully, someone is finally standing up to Hawking: Stephen Colbert does a shockingly accurate impression of this clown that has surely bumped him down a couple of pegs.
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software