This is one of those uncomfortable pages that I keep coming back to (the 25ish edits in its history since April are nothing compared to those from its time in my sandbox). As such, my question is the same one that I generally ask when I bring a page here; is it funny satire? 04:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the review. I did consider trying to integrate that pic you mentioned into the page, but its texty nature would look like a smear at such a small size (even full size it's a blurry mess). 00:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdfs:label
| - Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Kids still fucking
|
rdfs:comment
| - This is one of those uncomfortable pages that I keep coming back to (the 25ish edits in its history since April are nothing compared to those from its time in my sandbox). As such, my question is the same one that I generally ask when I bring a page here; is it funny satire? 04:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the review. I did consider trying to integrate that pic you mentioned into the page, but its texty nature would look like a smear at such a small size (even full size it's a blurry mess). 00:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Mcomment
| - "Just say 'No to cock". hehehe.
|
Pcomment
| - no problems here. there's a lot of italicized quotes, but an UnNews story "should" have lots of italicized quotes.
|
Icomment
| - i found the first image to be quite funny, mostly due to the caption. the other two were solid, but nothing spectacular. i personally thought the leading picture of the fourth link to be hilarious..."NO SCREWIN' AROUND" with a perfectly ethnically diverse group of blissful virgins. perhaps you could incorporate that.
|
Pscore
| |
Ccomment
| - this is what UnNews is all about: taking a real news story and spinning it until its ridiculousness becomes apparent
|
Cscore
| |
Mscore
| |
Hcomment
| - an above-average number of chuckles
|
Iscore
| |
Hscore
| |
Fcomment
| - a spendidly done UnNews. this is definitely funny satire in its prime. i'd support on VFH without as much second thought as...something funny relating to sex-ed...
|
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
Signature
| |
abstract
| - This is one of those uncomfortable pages that I keep coming back to (the 25ish edits in its history since April are nothing compared to those from its time in my sandbox). As such, my question is the same one that I generally ask when I bring a page here; is it funny satire? 04:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the review. I did consider trying to integrate that pic you mentioned into the page, but its texty nature would look like a smear at such a small size (even full size it's a blurry mess). 00:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC) good point. i'm satisfied with the link. -- 02:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
|