About: Old Dutch units of length or distance

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Old Dutch units of length or distance Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

The lengths of these units varied from place to place. Cardarelli gives an equivalence of 0.2830594 m for the voet in Amsterdam and that value is used in the table below. Note that Cardarelli writes "lyne" rather than "lĳne" but the latter seems to be the correct spelling. He also writes "voeten" (which is, apparently, actually the plural form) rather than "voet" (and similarly, "duime" rather than "duim", and "roeden" rather than "roede") and that there were 12 duime in the Amsterdam voet, while the Wikipedia article states that there were 11. The following table shows, according to Wikipedia, the relationships among the units in various localities:

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Old Dutch units of length or distance
rdfs:comment	The lengths of these units varied from place to place. Cardarelli gives an equivalence of 0.2830594 m for the voet in Amsterdam and that value is used in the table below. Note that Cardarelli writes "lyne" rather than "lĳne" but the latter seems to be the correct spelling. He also writes "voeten" (which is, apparently, actually the plural form) rather than "voet" (and similarly, "duime" rather than "duim", and "roeden" rather than "roede") and that there were 12 duime in the Amsterdam voet, while the Wikipedia article states that there were 11. The following table shows, according to Wikipedia, the relationships among the units in various localities:
dbkwik:units/prope...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/X4T0T0poL-mLTtm5OkTByw== dbkwik:resource/8GXJpk3ovjj5ZHlfKeUcww== dbkwik:resource/pG2FbJiUvRhFrbzn2BjyzQ== dbkwik:resource/APRuMVKtc83wYYFisBQwUw== dbkwik:resource/XJvq6fUSPbcJ5QGEFBIx1Q==
abstract	The lengths of these units varied from place to place. Cardarelli gives an equivalence of 0.2830594 m for the voet in Amsterdam and that value is used in the table below. Note that Cardarelli writes "lyne" rather than "lĳne" but the latter seems to be the correct spelling. He also writes "voeten" (which is, apparently, actually the plural form) rather than "voet" (and similarly, "duime" rather than "duim", and "roeden" rather than "roede") and that there were 12 duime in the Amsterdam voet, while the Wikipedia article states that there were 11. The following table shows, according to Wikipedia, the relationships among the units in various localities:

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software