Text
| - How about when a fight is finished, an announcer comment is added in order to describe the fight, like "Zant now has Aghamin in a leg hold.....This fight is over!"
- How about special matches that only features characters who have won at least once in the Temple of Courage?
- I'm strongly against removing the IP voting. If it weren't for the Temple of Courage, I may not be here today . The Temple of Courage can lead in IPs to maybe become members in order to get a stronger vote in the matter.
- There doesn't appear to be any message on the page right now that are in violation with rules regarding language. It might be easier if you specify which comments you refer to, especially since what's "appropriate" depends on one's relative point of view in most cases.
- I'm guessing that they are often the actual user who forgot to log in. We should remove the vote and leave the message in the edit summary "Log in and re-enter your vote." If the IP does it again, then block the IP for two weeks.
- Well, IPs occasionally change, so some people who've edited before may appear to be "new" users, but we can't know for sure, right? Anyway, most of these people are probably just passing through to vote for whomever they like and then leave without getting more immersed into the wiki. And they're free to do that, of course. And hey, not all votes have to be insightful and lengthy, right? Sometimes you've got to call a Sam Spade a Philip Marlow. In closing, there isn't really much to do. I think they should have the right to vote, and even if they misuse our trust in them, who cares? It's only a popularity contest on a wiki. It's not really that big of a deal, well, actually, there might not even be a "deal" at all.
- There's no way to be sure of that, and embarking on a McCarthyesque witch hunt is both unfair for those users who deserve trust, and just plain sucks. There is little to nothing we can do it such is the case, though. Besides, I thought you were busy trying to shut this place down?
|