About: Top Five LEAST Awful Disney Sequels   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbkwik:resource/xoykDFxJFBgF02W_HRnEzw==, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

NCh: Last year... (realizes that last year was only a week ago) ...last week, I labored through every single Disney direct-to-video sequel and brought you a, list of the ones I considered the top ten worst, ‘cause people love lists, they love Disney and they love the word “worst”. Imagine that. But, this did lead to some people inquiring as to what I considered to be the, “best” (images of the word “BEST” appears). Problem with the word “best” is that it implies, “good” or, “warrants existing”. (Clips of the multiple Disney Sequels)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Top Five LEAST Awful Disney Sequels
rdfs:comment
  • NCh: Last year... (realizes that last year was only a week ago) ...last week, I labored through every single Disney direct-to-video sequel and brought you a, list of the ones I considered the top ten worst, ‘cause people love lists, they love Disney and they love the word “worst”. Imagine that. But, this did lead to some people inquiring as to what I considered to be the, “best” (images of the word “BEST” appears). Problem with the word “best” is that it implies, “good” or, “warrants existing”. (Clips of the multiple Disney Sequels)
dcterms:subject
Row 4 info
Row 1 info
  • 2012-01-15(xsd:date)
Row 4 title
  • Next Review
Row 2 info
  • 1205.0
Row 1 title
  • Released
Row 5 info
Row 2 title
  • Running Time
Row 5 title
  • Link
Row 3 info
Row 3 title
  • Previous Review
Box Title
  • The Top Five LEAST Awful Disney Sequels
dbkwik:thatguywith...iPageUsesTemplate
Image size
  • 320(xsd:integer)
Image File
  • Least awful disney sequels nch.jpg
abstract
  • NCh: Last year... (realizes that last year was only a week ago) ...last week, I labored through every single Disney direct-to-video sequel and brought you a, list of the ones I considered the top ten worst, ‘cause people love lists, they love Disney and they love the word “worst”. Imagine that. But, this did lead to some people inquiring as to what I considered to be the, “best” (images of the word “BEST” appears). Problem with the word “best” is that it implies, “good” or, “warrants existing”. (Clips of the multiple Disney Sequels) NCh (VO): At best, some are less awful than others, but after the literally dozens of hours I spent slogging through this mess... NCh: ...I thought I could give you a best list to counteract the worst list but honestly, I don’t think I can. But, I can give you a relatively less awful, list. NCh (VO): In a way, this was a more difficult list to put together. Because while there were a couple that surprised me at how relatively not awful they were, the majority are, well, let’s just say that before Lasseter took over, it was a, dark time. NCh: So this week, we’re going to try to be... less, mean, and give you a... less, awful, list, to, balance, out, the last one so, with that, I give you my top. (The word “TOP” appears in capitals again and will do so for the rest of the words in the title, just like in the previous list, but not as grand.) T... Five. (TEN “Five”) ...L-east Awful. (“LEAST AWFUL”) Disney Sequels. (“DISNEY SEQUELS”) Why only five? ‘cause I, I can’t.
is Row 4 info of
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software