About: FFXIclopedia:AfD Discussions/Template:Manthra   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Comment: hmmmmm..... --Gahoo 11:25, 18 July 2006 (EDT) Comment: O,o --Daniel 11:26, 18 July 2006 (EDT) Comment: Thought it seemed appropriate to have a Manthra template. Hope it's not too evil :) Rirotiro Comment: Only one word for this, ROFL. kinda wrong, but I love it Jengel Delete: It's funny, sure, but I don't believe this is FFXIclopedia material. The only reference to Manthra in the wiki should be in the Final Fantasy XI Dictionary of Terms and Slang and it's already in there. (Let's try to follow the AfD comment style) --Ganiman 18:52, 18 July 2006 (EDT)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • FFXIclopedia:AfD Discussions/Template:Manthra
rdfs:comment
  • Comment: hmmmmm..... --Gahoo 11:25, 18 July 2006 (EDT) Comment: O,o --Daniel 11:26, 18 July 2006 (EDT) Comment: Thought it seemed appropriate to have a Manthra template. Hope it's not too evil :) Rirotiro Comment: Only one word for this, ROFL. kinda wrong, but I love it Jengel Delete: It's funny, sure, but I don't believe this is FFXIclopedia material. The only reference to Manthra in the wiki should be in the Final Fantasy XI Dictionary of Terms and Slang and it's already in there. (Let's try to follow the AfD comment style) --Ganiman 18:52, 18 July 2006 (EDT)
dcterms:subject
abstract
  • Comment: hmmmmm..... --Gahoo 11:25, 18 July 2006 (EDT) Comment: O,o --Daniel 11:26, 18 July 2006 (EDT) Comment: Thought it seemed appropriate to have a Manthra template. Hope it's not too evil :) Rirotiro Comment: Only one word for this, ROFL. kinda wrong, but I love it Jengel Delete: It's funny, sure, but I don't believe this is FFXIclopedia material. The only reference to Manthra in the wiki should be in the Final Fantasy XI Dictionary of Terms and Slang and it's already in there. (Let's try to follow the AfD comment style) --Ganiman 18:52, 18 July 2006 (EDT) Delete : ... feels like ... OK, I won't comment. It just doesn't feels right to make this into your profile, regardless if it's the truth or not--VZX 21:30, 18 July 2006 (EDT) Delete : On one hand, its going to be used only on a User's Page, which it does no real harm on. I mean if someone wants to claim to be retarded, you can't stop them. On the other hand, its not offical FFXI material and should only be found on the Final Fantasy XI Dictionary of Terms and Slang page. I am a big person for only using things that are FFXI relevant and even though its is only for someones personnal User Page... I don't think its something we should encourage users to use. Therefor, to take temptation away from possibley making this site appear more informal it would do good to get rid of it. We have enough critism as is. Why add fuel to the fire? --Nynaeve 11:13, 19 July 2006 (EDT) Comment/Keep: I kind of assumed people would make additional userboxes as they saw fit. I don't really see the harm here since it relates to FFXI. Nothing really stops someone from adding the code itself to their page - so is all we are really talking about is it being a template and/or being on the Userboxes page? If someone added a box that was unrelated to FFXI I would lean towards delete, but as is I think this relates to FFXI and AFAIK is unoffensive. --Gahoo 11:34, 19 July 2006 (EDT) Resolution: Deleted --Mierin 11:20, 21 July 2006 (EDT)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software