In my opinion, this is completely foolish. "Ignore all rules". I certainly know Wikipedia didn't become a success by ignoring all their rules. Having good, clear rules, along with simply following and enforcing them, makes a good wiki. Wylind Image:Presidentialseal.gif(Conference Room) 19:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
* Actually, "Ignore all rules" comes directly from Wikipedia. That idea is one that basically says if a rule gets in the way of maintaining a sense of encyclopedic quality and standard, it should be avoided. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 03:37, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Fanon Wiki talk:Simplified Ruleset
|
| rdfs:comment
| - In my opinion, this is completely foolish. "Ignore all rules". I certainly know Wikipedia didn't become a success by ignoring all their rules. Having good, clear rules, along with simply following and enforcing them, makes a good wiki. Wylind Image:Presidentialseal.gif(Conference Room) 19:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
* Actually, "Ignore all rules" comes directly from Wikipedia. That idea is one that basically says if a rule gets in the way of maintaining a sense of encyclopedic quality and standard, it should be avoided. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 03:37, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
| dbkwik:fanon/prope...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| abstract
| - In my opinion, this is completely foolish. "Ignore all rules". I certainly know Wikipedia didn't become a success by ignoring all their rules. Having good, clear rules, along with simply following and enforcing them, makes a good wiki. Wylind Image:Presidentialseal.gif(Conference Room) 19:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
* Actually, "Ignore all rules" comes directly from Wikipedia. That idea is one that basically says if a rule gets in the way of maintaining a sense of encyclopedic quality and standard, it should be avoided. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 03:37, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
|