About: Zeldapedia:Temple of Courage/Suggestions/Archive 80   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Try number 3. The two cel-shaded, sea-monster, mini-boss battles who have eyes that you have to shoot out to win going sucker to fin. Sincerely, Watcher. File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg Oppose: It's still lame, predictable and unimaginative. Tell you what, if nothing better comes up this week, I'll eventually support it. --AuronKaizer! 18:08, February 7, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg Oppose: Still no. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 18:24, February 7, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting support.svg Support: I think I liked this before. Portal-Kombat File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Do you support anything that deals with TWW? --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 19:06, February 7, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral: I liked this before but it's getting kind of old

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Zeldapedia:Temple of Courage/Suggestions/Archive 80
rdfs:comment
  • Try number 3. The two cel-shaded, sea-monster, mini-boss battles who have eyes that you have to shoot out to win going sucker to fin. Sincerely, Watcher. File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg Oppose: It's still lame, predictable and unimaginative. Tell you what, if nothing better comes up this week, I'll eventually support it. --AuronKaizer! 18:08, February 7, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg Oppose: Still no. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 18:24, February 7, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting support.svg Support: I think I liked this before. Portal-Kombat File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Do you support anything that deals with TWW? --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 19:06, February 7, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral: I liked this before but it's getting kind of old
dbkwik:zelda/prope...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Try number 3. The two cel-shaded, sea-monster, mini-boss battles who have eyes that you have to shoot out to win going sucker to fin. Sincerely, Watcher. File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg Oppose: It's still lame, predictable and unimaginative. Tell you what, if nothing better comes up this week, I'll eventually support it. --AuronKaizer! 18:08, February 7, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg Oppose: Still no. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 18:24, February 7, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting support.svg Support: I think I liked this before. Portal-Kombat File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Do you support anything that deals with TWW? --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 19:06, February 7, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral: I liked this before but it's getting kind of old now. Don't know what to think anymore. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 20:38, February 7, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting support.svg Support: I didn't vote for this before because I was always suggesting other fights. But I don't have any ideas this week, and I like this fight, so I'm supporting it. --Sir Real 8:52 PM 2/7/10 File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: EveryDayJoe45, I support almost anything that deals with TWW. Let's see... I don't think I'd support Moblin Statue vs. Star Belt Archipelago. Portal-Kombat File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: I wouldnt mind seing a Mmoblin statue in a fight. nut what to pit it againest? Oni Dark Link 08:14, February 8, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Your best shot would probably be Beamos but considering how much more well known it is that probably wouldn't go over so well. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 08:51, February 8, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Commentthats exactly the way i was thinking Oni Dark Link 16:01, February 8, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral: Pretty good, but I predict some slight one-sidedness, which bugs me, and I don't care for bugs.--Redeadhunter 17:16, February 8, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: I love bugs :( Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 23:40, February 8, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Uhh, shouldn't you be tearing his head off about bug-generalization now? --AuronKaizer! 01:06, February 9, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: It is not bug generalization, as he is simply referring to the two major meanings of the term "bug", not mistaking the definition of one meaning. Therefore it is a terrible joke if anything. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 02:51, February 9, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Precisely, Thomson. --AuronKaizer! 02:57, February 9, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg Oppose: It does have an image, but it is also bland. And I'm beginning to grow tired of this fight, as well.-- C2 / CC 00:50, February 9, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment:Can't I say anything without startiong some kind of quantum physics discussion?--Redeadhunter 21:43, February 9, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: How was that related to quantum physics in any way? It wasn't even related to science. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 00:11, February 10, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Logical discussion, then.--Redeadhunter 02:39, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software