About: Not Anything   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Well if nothing is indeed nothing, why have we even bothered making a huge list of stupid words to describe nothing? Nothing could be: (Not anything. Zero, zilch, zip, nil) Why the heck don’t we just have one flipping word to describe nothing instead of having several hundred descriptions of the word It’s so meaningless like having dogs protecting a lamb chop or sheep protecting a paddock of grass! It’s stupid to have a word that describes nothing if there isn’t anything to describe! Why the heck would you bother to think up the word nothing if it didn’t mean anything, but still didn’t mean nothing! It would mean it had to mean something but not anything at the same time! Man, it’s hard to talk about something that you don’t know anything about and even harder to talk about nothing! And to

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Not Anything
rdfs:comment
  • Well if nothing is indeed nothing, why have we even bothered making a huge list of stupid words to describe nothing? Nothing could be: (Not anything. Zero, zilch, zip, nil) Why the heck don’t we just have one flipping word to describe nothing instead of having several hundred descriptions of the word It’s so meaningless like having dogs protecting a lamb chop or sheep protecting a paddock of grass! It’s stupid to have a word that describes nothing if there isn’t anything to describe! Why the heck would you bother to think up the word nothing if it didn’t mean anything, but still didn’t mean nothing! It would mean it had to mean something but not anything at the same time! Man, it’s hard to talk about something that you don’t know anything about and even harder to talk about nothing! And to
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Well if nothing is indeed nothing, why have we even bothered making a huge list of stupid words to describe nothing? Nothing could be: (Not anything. Zero, zilch, zip, nil) Why the heck don’t we just have one flipping word to describe nothing instead of having several hundred descriptions of the word It’s so meaningless like having dogs protecting a lamb chop or sheep protecting a paddock of grass! It’s stupid to have a word that describes nothing if there isn’t anything to describe! Why the heck would you bother to think up the word nothing if it didn’t mean anything, but still didn’t mean nothing! It would mean it had to mean something but not anything at the same time! Man, it’s hard to talk about something that you don’t know anything about and even harder to talk about nothing! And to think that this is a page of stuff just referring to the obscenity of nothing and how stupid it is that we even have the word nothing if there isn’t anything that is nothing and that everything has to be something and THEREFORE nothing can be nothing and everything has to be something doesn’t it? Or am I just confusing the heck out of you? Anyway it’s confusing the heck out of me. Why I dedicate a page of words to talk about something that is something but is still nothing because nothing is not anything but nothingness. Phew! Anyway I think that nothing is a huge waste of time even thinking about because just thinking about nothing is impossible because you are always thinking about something because how can you be thinking of nothing? You are always thinking of something even if you think its nothing because then and only then you would be thinking about nothing, and still when you are thinking about nothing it can still be considered as something. Because if nothing is something wouldn’t we be able to think of a better description of nothing then: “Not anything”. Because if it’s not anything what the heck is it then? It would have to be a description like: “nothing” instead of not anything because nothing is nothing but what kind of description is nothing!?!?
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software