I've listed this article for peer review because I hope to take this to FAC in the coming weeks. Since its last peer review, it has passed a GA nomination and many areas have been restructured and/or expanded. I would really appreciate if someone can have a thorough look at it from top to bottom, or through speed reading suggest if the article needs much copyediting. Thanks, Lemonade51 (talk) 18:14, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Attributes | Values |
---|---|
rdfs:label |
|
rdfs:comment |
|
dbkwik:speedydelet...iPageUsesTemplate | |
abstract |
|