About: Copyright Clause and First Amendment

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Copyright Clause and First Amendment Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

It is clear that the Copyright Clause is meant to foster values enshrined in the First Amendment. The Clause's primary purpose is to provide authors with incentives to produce works that will benefit the public.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Copyright Clause and First Amendment
rdfs:comment	It is clear that the Copyright Clause is meant to foster values enshrined in the First Amendment. The Clause's primary purpose is to provide authors with incentives to produce works that will benefit the public.
dcterms:subject	Copyright First Amendment U.S. Constitution
abstract	It is clear that the Copyright Clause is meant to foster values enshrined in the First Amendment. The Clause's primary purpose is to provide authors with incentives to produce works that will benefit the public. In Eldred v. Ashcroft, the connection between the First Amendment and copyright prompted the [[U.S. Supreme Court] to reject the proposition that "copyrights [are] categorically immune from challenges under the First Amendment." However, under the facts of Eldred, copyright's inherent free speech protections obviated any need for First Amendment review of the Copyright Term Extension Act (CTEA). The Court based this holding on three factors. First, the Court concluded that copyright law's "built-in First Amendment accommodations" — the idea/expression dichotomy and fair use defense — adequately protected the First Amendment interests at stake. Second, the Court reasoned that the plaintiffs had only a trivial interest in the copyrighted works because "[t]he First Amendment securely protects the freedom to make — or decline to make — one's own speech; it bears less heavily when speakers assert the right to make other people's speeches." Finally, the Court noted that the CTEA provided supplemental protections to ensure that the Act did not diminish the public's access to protected expression. The Court further indicated that legislation could be subject to First Amendment scrutiny if it "altered the traditional contours of copyright protection."

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software