About: WoWWiki talk:Village pump/Archive07

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: WoWWiki talk:Village pump/Archive07 Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Currently, we have e.g. , but it seems to me that it doesn't quite encompass everything that the players want. We have pages listing rare crafters on servers, guild progression pages, etc... I'm thinking that something like "Category:Server:Servername" would work better. Question though: should we move guilds over to the server categories, or should the guild categories simply be subcategories to server categories, once created? --Mikk 08:19, 26 August 2006 (EDT)

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	WoWWiki talk:Village pump/Archive07
rdfs:comment	Currently, we have e.g. , but it seems to me that it doesn't quite encompass everything that the players want. We have pages listing rare crafters on servers, guild progression pages, etc... I'm thinking that something like "Category:Server:Servername" would work better. Question though: should we move guilds over to the server categories, or should the guild categories simply be subcategories to server categories, once created? --Mikk 08:19, 26 August 2006 (EDT)
dbkwik:wowwiki/pro...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/3O8qZnZ5kE4IqCnWsSHeDw== dbkwik:resource/Zhsh54BkA-ms_Y-84LdYSA== dbkwik:resource/GlhUDPgCMMp46v__VA_6Wg==
abstract	Currently, we have e.g. , but it seems to me that it doesn't quite encompass everything that the players want. We have pages listing rare crafters on servers, guild progression pages, etc... I'm thinking that something like "Category:Server:Servername" would work better. Question though: should we move guilds over to the server categories, or should the guild categories simply be subcategories to server categories, once created? --Mikk 08:19, 26 August 2006 (EDT) I suggest we move the guilds to the server categories. Considering that the vast majority of the new server categories (if we go ahead with that plan) will have only one article in them (the server page itself), I don't think it's necessary to subdivide them any further just for guild pages. If we had 20 or 30 guild pages per server things would be different, but for now it's best to keep things simpler. :) --Rahskala 16:27, 27 August 2006 (EDT) Generaly I agree, but some of the more established servers have a large number of guilds with wiki pages and I think that for those servers, a guild sub category should be created to help with the organization of those servers. Boetin 00:57, 19 October 2006 (EDT)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software