abstract
| - This article has no sources other than the site itself, was created by a clear COI account, and lacks even the most basic rules for notability. Was prodded but an editor removed that notice with the claim "not sure is non-notable, it is mentioned by many RS... proceed via AfD if necessary" but did not actually provide any reliable sources. DreamGuy (talk) 20:19, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
* Comment I've managed to find some little sources that mentions the magazine: [1][2][3]. Regards. --—Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 20:56, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
* Delete: Ref #1 above is inaccesible to me, #2 & #3 are just passing mentions so not substantial coverage as required by the GNG. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:26, 9 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 10 June 2012 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
|