About: EarthBound Cooker   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

The idea for the EB Cooker evolved as we were building and analyzing funnel cookers and Parvati cookers. These cookers, and most other panel cookers, primarily heat the top and sides of the cooking pot. The heat transfer mechanism from the top of the pot to the contents of the pot usually is not very efficient. Therefore, we decided to design a cooker that heats the bottom and sides of the pot. Parabolic cookers meet this requirement. However, they are dangerous because of the point focus, they are relatively hard to build because of the parabolic curve, and the heat usually is unevenly distributed over the pot surface. We chose to design double angle cone and triple angle cone cookers because they are relatively easy to build, and do not have a point focus. The only curves that need to be

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • EarthBound Cooker
rdfs:comment
  • The idea for the EB Cooker evolved as we were building and analyzing funnel cookers and Parvati cookers. These cookers, and most other panel cookers, primarily heat the top and sides of the cooking pot. The heat transfer mechanism from the top of the pot to the contents of the pot usually is not very efficient. Therefore, we decided to design a cooker that heats the bottom and sides of the pot. Parabolic cookers meet this requirement. However, they are dangerous because of the point focus, they are relatively hard to build because of the parabolic curve, and the heat usually is unevenly distributed over the pot surface. We chose to design double angle cone and triple angle cone cookers because they are relatively easy to build, and do not have a point focus. The only curves that need to be
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:solarcookin...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • The idea for the EB Cooker evolved as we were building and analyzing funnel cookers and Parvati cookers. These cookers, and most other panel cookers, primarily heat the top and sides of the cooking pot. The heat transfer mechanism from the top of the pot to the contents of the pot usually is not very efficient. Therefore, we decided to design a cooker that heats the bottom and sides of the pot. Parabolic cookers meet this requirement. However, they are dangerous because of the point focus, they are relatively hard to build because of the parabolic curve, and the heat usually is unevenly distributed over the pot surface. We chose to design double angle cone and triple angle cone cookers because they are relatively easy to build, and do not have a point focus. The only curves that need to be cut are circles. We have experimented with different support structures to hold the pot just inside the mouth of the cooker The EB cookers are designed to focus all of the reflected energy onto a spherical target. The sphere is used to represent the cylindrical cooking pots because the aspect ratio of the pot varies when the cooker is rotated about the pot as the sun elevation angle changes. However, all of the reflected energy will hit the pot provided the smallest dimension of the pot is less than or equal to the diameter of the target sphere. In practice, we recommend using a pot with smallest dimension larger than the diameter of the target sphere so that all of the reflected energy will hit the pot even when the cooker is pointed a few degrees from the sun. Earthbound Solar Cookers are designated as EB followed by the cooker cone diameter in inches and a D or T for Double or Triple angle cone. For example, the EB‑42T has a diameter of 42 inches and is a triple cone design while the EB‑30D has a diameter of 30 inches and is a double cone design. When building a cooker, one of the first decisions is how large it should be. Larger cookers will cook faster, but smaller cookers usually are less expensive to build and are easier to transport and store. We usually favor larger cookers because we believe that solar cookers will be more widely accepted if their performance is closer to that of the typical kitchen stove. However, if you don’t mind waiting longer for the food to cook, food cooked in slow cookers can be especially delicious. For EB cookers, another decision is whether to use a double or triple cone design. The diameter of the target sphere is determined by dividing the cooker diameter by 5 for double cone cookers and by 7 of triple cone cookers. For example, both the EB‑42T and EB‑30D focus the energy onto a 6” diameter sphere when pointed directly at the sun. If the cooking pot you intend to use has a diameter of at least 6” and is at least 6” deep, either of these designs would work. However, an EB‑30T, would have a 4.3” target sphere and would allow the use of smaller pots and provide some margin for focusing error. Even though it takes a bit longer to build a triple cone than it does a double cone, we recommend triple cones for all but the smallest cookers. We have built several prototype EB cookers. We have completed an EB‑42T and an EB‑30D, and have started an EB‑24T. Most of the testing has been done with the EB‑42T using our data acquisition system. Also, we have cooked a few meals in the EB‑42T. The results of the tests are very encouraging and will be reported elsewhere on the web site.
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software