An article may be deleted from Religion Wiki by a religion wiki staffmember for any of the following reasons (non-exclusive):
* Its sole purpose is vandalism (obscenity, nonsense, etc.).
* It has no content (may include only headers or external links).
* It is not encyclopedic (may be an essay, personal opinion, polemic, directory, etc.)
* It is not directly relevant to the religion theme.
* It is non-notable (i.e., not important enough to history to be included in an encyclopedia).
* It duplicates an existing article.
* It is in a user's personal userspace who has requested deletion.
* There is a consensus of editors and sysops that the article is inappropriate or unnecessary.
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - ReligionWiki:Deletion policy
|
| rdfs:comment
| - An article may be deleted from Religion Wiki by a religion wiki staffmember for any of the following reasons (non-exclusive):
* Its sole purpose is vandalism (obscenity, nonsense, etc.).
* It has no content (may include only headers or external links).
* It is not encyclopedic (may be an essay, personal opinion, polemic, directory, etc.)
* It is not directly relevant to the religion theme.
* It is non-notable (i.e., not important enough to history to be included in an encyclopedia).
* It duplicates an existing article.
* It is in a user's personal userspace who has requested deletion.
* There is a consensus of editors and sysops that the article is inappropriate or unnecessary.
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| dbkwik:religion/pr...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| abstract
| - An article may be deleted from Religion Wiki by a religion wiki staffmember for any of the following reasons (non-exclusive):
* Its sole purpose is vandalism (obscenity, nonsense, etc.).
* It has no content (may include only headers or external links).
* It is not encyclopedic (may be an essay, personal opinion, polemic, directory, etc.)
* It is not directly relevant to the religion theme.
* It is non-notable (i.e., not important enough to history to be included in an encyclopedia).
* It duplicates an existing article.
* It is in a user's personal userspace who has requested deletion.
* There is a consensus of editors and sysops that the article is inappropriate or unnecessary.
|