About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Guy Gets Crazy

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Guy Gets Crazy Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

For young'ns unable to get the references, look at the sources. Also, yes this is an injoke (just warning beforehand). -- 03:44, 19 November 2007 (UTC) I would like to review this, as I recall when the retarded brother of this article got nominated! Dec 1, 16:28 I hate reviewing people who are good writers, because I usually don't know how to improve the thing! Dec 18:11, 1

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Guy Gets Crazy
rdfs:comment	For young'ns unable to get the references, look at the sources. Also, yes this is an injoke (just warning beforehand). -- 03:44, 19 November 2007 (UTC) I would like to review this, as I recall when the retarded brother of this article got nominated! Dec 1, 16:28 I hate reviewing people who are good writers, because I usually don't know how to improve the thing! Dec 18:11, 1
dcterms:subject	Pee Review
Mcomment	dbkwik:resource/W88zu5x_9U19J4KDt9ZzoA==
Pcomment	perfection. center\|200px
Icomment	lolz! Serious lolz.
Pscore	10(xsd:integer)
Ccomment	Well, it's an original idea sporked from an idea that was already done. Does that make sense? I thought so. I knew it made fuckin' sense.
Cscore	7(xsd:integer)
Hcomment	avg of all the sections from the perspective of a person who knows the injoke * Intro [9] Ha! Awesomeness abounds in the introduction. I'm comparing this side by side with the old version in illogicopedia, so I can see the "original intention". That makes it even funnier! [sic] * 1 First Stunt [6] Whoa, that was random. Uh, I have no idea what's going on, so maybe I'm just teh stupidz. Is this a combination of the old version and a play on the word "Mars"? * 2 Second Stunt [9] That was pretty fucking hilarious, sir. * 3 Third Stunt [8] Good! What else do I say? * 4 Aftermath [7] Yes, it's FINE. * 5 Footnotes [9] I loved the footnotes. Making it roughly eighty stories from the ground. * 6 Sources [n/a] obviously, you need the sources to make the article "jive".
Iscore	10(xsd:integer)
Hscore	(9+6+9+8+7+9)/6 round1
Fcomment	Obviously would fail VFH because it's an injoke that most people, even regulars, wouldn't get, but this deserves some type of recognition. :D smiley for you!
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/W88zu5x_9U19J4KDt9ZzoA== dbkwik:resource/yFN67gnsWPKFr390CT1mxA==
Signature	Cajek/sig (Dec 18:11, 1)
abstract	For young'ns unable to get the references, look at the sources. Also, yes this is an injoke (just warning beforehand). -- 03:44, 19 November 2007 (UTC) I would like to review this, as I recall when the retarded brother of this article got nominated! Dec 1, 16:28 I hate reviewing people who are good writers, because I usually don't know how to improve the thing! Dec 18:11, 1

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software