[[Category:Deletion survivor/]] Looks like a cross between FFW and CVW. Great! Huffing pure junk, while rewriting articles with promise. In one way, your standard for V-templated articles is tougher than the QVFD ones. In QVFD, admins show some diligance in deciding if an article should be deleted. But with the V-template, if an article is not adopted, it's gone at the sole discretion of one non-admin. There doesn't seem to be much safeguard against the subjectivity. Can the author adopt his/her own article? 18:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC) I'd say yes, or move it to userspace and remove the template. Or, if you think it's good enough to stay as is, talk to the person who tagged it and then either agree it's ok or take it to VFD. And as for the safegard against subjectivity, the de
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Uncyclopedia talk:Vigilance Week
|
| rdfs:comment
| - [[Category:Deletion survivor/]] Looks like a cross between FFW and CVW. Great! Huffing pure junk, while rewriting articles with promise. In one way, your standard for V-templated articles is tougher than the QVFD ones. In QVFD, admins show some diligance in deciding if an article should be deleted. But with the V-template, if an article is not adopted, it's gone at the sole discretion of one non-admin. There doesn't seem to be much safeguard against the subjectivity. Can the author adopt his/her own article? 18:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC) I'd say yes, or move it to userspace and remove the template. Or, if you think it's good enough to stay as is, talk to the person who tagged it and then either agree it's ok or take it to VFD. And as for the safegard against subjectivity, the de
|
| dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| Date
| |
| Page
| - archive203#Uncyclopedia:_Vigilance_Week
|
| Result
| |
| abstract
| - [[Category:Deletion survivor/]] Looks like a cross between FFW and CVW. Great! Huffing pure junk, while rewriting articles with promise. In one way, your standard for V-templated articles is tougher than the QVFD ones. In QVFD, admins show some diligance in deciding if an article should be deleted. But with the V-template, if an article is not adopted, it's gone at the sole discretion of one non-admin. There doesn't seem to be much safeguard against the subjectivity. Can the author adopt his/her own article? 18:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC) I'd say yes, or move it to userspace and remove the template. Or, if you think it's good enough to stay as is, talk to the person who tagged it and then either agree it's ok or take it to VFD. And as for the safegard against subjectivity, the deleting admin still has to decide if it's bad enough to delete. It's exactly the sam as ICU without the time limit in that respect. 08:29, 26 Sep 2007 Except there is no limit to the number of articles you can ICU, correct? I don't like the 5-article {{V}}-limit. Of course... if nobody is counting... Your only supposed to adopt five articles. Feel free to tag whatever you want. -- 17:09, 2 October 2007 (UTC) See kids? This is what happens when you read stuff after being up for 24 hours straight... D'oh. *commences {{V}}-ing.
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)