About: WoWWiki talk:List of unique character icons

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: WoWWiki talk:List of unique character icons Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

I think Putress is WotLK. Why? Same reason Blood Elves and High Elves are TBC. Putress appears in an event of TBC, but he was implemented for WotLK and currently can only be seen at WotLK content. So I think he should be WotLK. If you want to put it TBC, then change Varian to vanilla. After all, he was at Alcaz. --Lon-ami (talk) 17:19, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	WoWWiki talk:List of unique character icons
rdfs:comment	I think Putress is WotLK. Why? Same reason Blood Elves and High Elves are TBC. Putress appears in an event of TBC, but he was implemented for WotLK and currently can only be seen at WotLK content. So I think he should be WotLK. If you want to put it TBC, then change Varian to vanilla. After all, he was at Alcaz. --Lon-ami (talk) 17:19, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
dbkwik:wowwiki/pro...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/7AD7n2rYIWBB7ksU0X1Kcw== dbkwik:resource/Vhocfd3TV2-TOGse-0lkrg== dbkwik:resource/o7sRcVpsgYytCX5fsylPWg== dbkwik:resource/pWloWvswMaVieLzV7220OQ== dbkwik:resource/u1cUCBPj6oFJUFO6tVCY9A== dbkwik:resource/3dyXfXiympVB8sb47vu27g== dbkwik:resource/EF3iu6gI9VhxGp0pICBBiA==
abstract	I think Putress is WotLK. Why? Same reason Blood Elves and High Elves are TBC. Putress appears in an event of TBC, but he was implemented for WotLK and currently can only be seen at WotLK content. So I think he should be WotLK. If you want to put it TBC, then change Varian to vanilla. After all, he was at Alcaz. --Lon-ami (talk) 17:19, 3 April 2009 (UTC) If you're still on the idea of "interacting" then no, Varian remains WotLK, as he gave no "buble speech" and no quest while he was in Alcaz, unlinke Putress. 08:50, 4 April 2009 (UTC) He was at Stormwind, too. During the event. Like Putress. --Lon-ami (talk) 09:28, 4 April 2009 (UTC) Well yes for that, but not Vanilla has you said first :) He's like putress. Or we can put for those characters who made their first appearance in the pre-wotlk event. 09:31, 4 April 2009 (UTC) So, why is Varian WotLK when you can interact with him in vanilla? (He's at Stormwind) And why is Putress TBC when you need WotLK to interact with him? (He's no longer at Shattrath) I would leave they tagged with the expansion when they appeared. 3.0.2 is part of WotLK, as the 3 indicates. It's the most simple and the best option in my opinion. Else, we would have problems with characters like Nazgrel, who was at Grommash Hold and now is at Thrallmar. And same with the blood elves. --Lon-ami (talk) 09:40, 4 April 2009 (UTC) I would have to agree with Lonus-Amicus here. Both Putress and Varian are heavily tied up to the WoTLK expansion, and the only argument for tagging them as BC is that they appeared in the pre-WotLK event, which had all to do with the story WotLK and nothing to do with that of BC. -- 08:58, 5 April 2009 (UTC) Yeah, that's it! But I'll wait for A'noob to reply before changing anything. Anyway, Varghedin, I'm looking forward the new icons of Ulduar :P. --Lon-ami (talk) 10:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC) It's a frakkin' trap! shoot himself 10:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software