About: Wookieepedia talk:April Fools' Day 2010/Forbidden Love   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

BLASPHEMY! This is an outrage! JangFett (Jabba!) 01:24, April 1, 2010 (UTC) * Too bad. It's official. The fanboys can have orgasms now. CC7567 (talk) 01:26, April 1, 2010 (UTC) Source? Drewton Image:Era-old.png (Drewton's Holocron) 02:27, April 1, 2010 (UTC) * The proper way to request source is to spam "ZOMG SAUCE!" Also, is the theme this year "Scavenger Hunt"? Dangerdan97 02:31, April 1, 2010 (UTC) Is this really canon, or just a simple joke for the April Fool's day? —Unsigned comment by JangFett 23 (talk • contribs). blasphemy....scam 188.27.134.149 09:52, April 1, 2010 (UTC)mike1803

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Wookieepedia talk:April Fools' Day 2010/Forbidden Love
rdfs:comment
  • BLASPHEMY! This is an outrage! JangFett (Jabba!) 01:24, April 1, 2010 (UTC) * Too bad. It's official. The fanboys can have orgasms now. CC7567 (talk) 01:26, April 1, 2010 (UTC) Source? Drewton Image:Era-old.png (Drewton's Holocron) 02:27, April 1, 2010 (UTC) * The proper way to request source is to spam "ZOMG SAUCE!" Also, is the theme this year "Scavenger Hunt"? Dangerdan97 02:31, April 1, 2010 (UTC) Is this really canon, or just a simple joke for the April Fool's day? —Unsigned comment by JangFett 23 (talk • contribs). blasphemy....scam 188.27.134.149 09:52, April 1, 2010 (UTC)mike1803
dbkwik:starwars/pr...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • BLASPHEMY! This is an outrage! JangFett (Jabba!) 01:24, April 1, 2010 (UTC) * Too bad. It's official. The fanboys can have orgasms now. CC7567 (talk) 01:26, April 1, 2010 (UTC) Source? Drewton Image:Era-old.png (Drewton's Holocron) 02:27, April 1, 2010 (UTC) * The proper way to request source is to spam "ZOMG SAUCE!" Also, is the theme this year "Scavenger Hunt"? Dangerdan97 02:31, April 1, 2010 (UTC) Is this really canon, or just a simple joke for the April Fool's day? —Unsigned comment by JangFett 23 (talk • contribs). * You can bet your blasters that it's real. This coming from the head of WP:TCW. CC7567 (talk) 03:59, April 1, 2010 (UTC) * Well, that's you. Don't we need a source, like a website or something? How did you get this information? * my uncle works for the clone wars and he told me about it i swear Menkooroo 06:11, April 1, 2010 (UTC) * Damm, April fool!! blasphemy....scam 188.27.134.149 09:52, April 1, 2010 (UTC)mike1803 Every thing in the page was so realistic, except the titles of the previous and next episodes. "Cody and Rex's Excellent Adventure" and "Wullf Yularen's Day Off" gave off that this was an April Fools thing. --Sithjedi 17:01, April 1, 2010 (UTC) Exactly!, I'm agree with you SithJedi, this must be an April Fool's day joke, come on, tell me, do you really think that this class of storyline can be presented on star wars? Well, at least i don't think so * I know! There's, like, a five year age difference between Ahsoka and Anakin, Lucas would be insane to pair up two people so far apart in age... Dangerdan97 17:40, April 1, 2010 (UTC) * No, that's not true, that's impossible! Lucas wouldn't be so crazy and insane for do something like that. And also i still thinking that this's just a bad joke from the April's fool day.—Unsigned comment by JangFett 23 (talk • contribs). * Well, to all those who think that it's an April Fools joke, just wait till tomorrow, when it's still up. Unfortunately, it's canon. Lucas continues to ruin Star Wars, although this is a new low. :| I saw an article about this somewhere, but I totally forget the link, or I'd post it here. If I remember what it was, I will post it. Chack Jadson (Talk) 19:25, April 1, 2010 (UTC) * Come on. We're talking about the guy who created the hated Jar Jar Binks as comic relief. And if its not an April Fool's joke, it might be a way for Ahsoka to learn of the marriage of Anakin & Padme.—Unsigned comment by Taliesin2 (talk • contribs). * I'm afraid it's confirmed. There will no longer be an Anakin and Padme marriage after this episode. JangFett (Talk) 19:33, April 1, 2010 (UTC) * You guys honestly fail at April Fools jokes. Seriously, go back to being an encyclopedia for Star Wars instead of trying to pull this crap off. You're really going to bother with April's Fool Day, a pointless holiday? Who are you guys trying to fool, 4 year olds? Just look at the names for the episodes that come before and after this failure joke. "Cody and Rex's Exciting Adventure"? "Wullf Yularen's Day Off"? Those names are a big give-away. * Also Chack, you're pretty chilled out for someone who has supposedly gotten his Wookieepedia image destroyed and is about to get his admin powers removed. Gh45 20:35, April 1, 2010 (UTC) * That what the joke, Gh45. However, Forbidden Love is not. It's confirmed, and we'll see what this episode is about on October 15. JangFett (Talk) 20:45, April 1, 2010 (UTC) * Haha, keep trying guys!! Basically you all fail, it's a poorly executed April Fool joke, and you reactions are exactly what they want you to react. And of course, JangFett, you will now post that this is not a joke. * No way. How the heck did the 4th episode info get released first?!?!? I'm not sure whether I should think that it's a really good April Fool's day joke, or Lucas would really do something that'll erase half his fan base. I mean, how does Padme still stick with Anakin through it all, if he's like drooling over his Padawan? Anakin and Ahsoka being together isn't that improbable, but really....and the episode names for the previous and next episodes are crazy. Duchess Jade File:Republic Emblem.svg (Completely Coruscanti) 23:24, April 1, 2010 (UTC) * The source once said Anakin divorces Padme. If you wish to know what Anakin does afterward, the episode's description will clarify it. JangFett (Talk) 00:06, April 2, 2010 (UTC) * Yes Gh45, it's an April Fools joke. Happy now? Chack Jadson (Talk) 00:12, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software