About: Uncyclopedia:Rating System   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Welcome to Uncyc 2.0, the new paradigm shift of the future of the web. Utilizing our content-free core contempencies, we will adjust using our agile tactics to the constantly changing uncyclopedic joke market. The concept is that we will instance a rating system in Uncyclopedia to assign a rating to each page. This is like the "validation" thing in Wikipedia which is being proposed. Concept mockup: --Chronarion 23:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Uncyclopedia:Rating System
rdfs:comment
  • Welcome to Uncyc 2.0, the new paradigm shift of the future of the web. Utilizing our content-free core contempencies, we will adjust using our agile tactics to the constantly changing uncyclopedic joke market. The concept is that we will instance a rating system in Uncyclopedia to assign a rating to each page. This is like the "validation" thing in Wikipedia which is being proposed. Concept mockup: --Chronarion 23:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Welcome to Uncyc 2.0, the new paradigm shift of the future of the web. Utilizing our content-free core contempencies, we will adjust using our agile tactics to the constantly changing uncyclopedic joke market. The concept is that we will instance a rating system in Uncyclopedia to assign a rating to each page. This is like the "validation" thing in Wikipedia which is being proposed. * Ratings will work for all users. Each user may assign a score to each individual revision of a page. Only the most recent score given by that individual will count. Anonymous users can make a vote once per IP per page. * The score of a page will be determined by the most recent revision scores given by all users for the page. This means the score attached to the latest revision, not necessarily the latest rating. When you click a rating, it will affect the current revision only. If you view a past revision, you can score that as well, and it will not affect your "resulting score". Users may revise their scores for any given revision as well as issue a new score for new revisions. * Administrators can clear scores or invalidate them, but given this system it seems unlikely that this will be necessary. I am currently leaning towards a five star scale, because it's easier to fit on the userbar. * A user that has not voted yet will see silver stars, and empty star outlines. Once they have voted, it will turn to gold stars, and outlines. Concept mockup: --Chronarion 23:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software