| rdfs:comment
| - __NOWYSIWYG__ Image:Ambox notice.svg Note: Please preface your posts with one of the following templates: {{support...}}, {{oppose...}}, {{neutral...}}, {{comment...}}, {{question...}}, or any appropriate template at .Bureaucrats’ closing notes and conclusions
Background
Decision
* Image:Pictogram voting delete.svg Closed. Lack of action on the part of the applicant. — SpikeToronto 05:57, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
|
| abstract
| - __NOWYSIWYG__ Image:Ambox notice.svg Note: Please preface your posts with one of the following templates: {{support...}}, {{oppose...}}, {{neutral...}}, {{comment...}}, {{question...}}, or any appropriate template at .
* Image:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Is there any reason you would need to run the wiki, as you say? Spike does a pretty good job of that and bureaucrats at this wiki are few and far between. The point of this wiki is to test admin tools, not become "an executive". It's up to Spike in the end, but I think you may have the wrong idea of what the wiki's for. And lastly, there's no real correlation between a good admin, and someone on Community Council in my opinion. I do support your admin request though. --Kangaroopowah (Talk) 04:46, December 1, 2014 (UTC)
* Image:Pictogram voting comment.svg Bureaucrat Note: I’ve very little to add to Kangaroopower’s comments, which are spot on. At this wiki, we issue the “testadmin” user right to those who want to either (1) learn what the admin tools are all about, prior to seeking RfR on their home wiki, or (2) test the admin tools without doing damage to their home wikis, on which they are already an admin. As for full-fledged admins and ’crats, this once busy wiki is now so quiet that additional such officers are not required. Further, were an increase in their number to become necessary, consideration would only be given to those with a history at this wiki, such as Kangaroopower. Thank you AwesomeOrange89 for your interest in Admin Tools Wiki: It is most appreciated. — SpikeToronto 17:08, December 3, 2014 (UTC)Bureaucrats’ closing notes and conclusions
Background
Decision
* Image:Pictogram voting delete.svg Closed. Lack of action on the part of the applicant. — SpikeToronto 05:57, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
|