About: Uncyclopedia:Ban Policy

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Uncyclopedia:Ban Policy Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Given a disruptive edit, Admins have to make an initial decision about the good faith of the editor, keeping in mind that some of our best talent started their lives as trolls. The Admin should act with tolerance and communication if there is a possibility that the editor simply does not know how Uncyclopedia works or that he is making crappy edits.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Uncyclopedia:Ban Policy
rdfs:comment	Given a disruptive edit, Admins have to make an initial decision about the good faith of the editor, keeping in mind that some of our best talent started their lives as trolls. The Admin should act with tolerance and communication if there is a possibility that the editor simply does not know how Uncyclopedia works or that he is making crappy edits.
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/C8np36kMpOroXMxAxvk4pw== dbkwik:resource/FvcgHZYYxHcw6-k3t5qLdQ==
abstract	Given a disruptive edit, Admins have to make an initial decision about the good faith of the editor, keeping in mind that some of our best talent started their lives as trolls. The Admin should act with tolerance and communication if there is a possibility that the editor simply does not know how Uncyclopedia works or that he is making crappy edits. * Registering as an Uncyclopedian (picking a user name) merits a presumption of good faith and a post to the new talk page rather than a ban as the first response. (However, if the new Uncyclopedian's first "contribution" is to upload porno, the Admin may assume the user only registered to gain access to Special:Upload, and ban his ass.) * As an example of the other extreme, edits featuring obscenities and racial slurs, and borderline-incoherent edits leading directly to the posting of someone else's website, are hints that the editor did not arrive to make positive contributions and will never care to learn how to do so. * A bad edit applied to a specific user's pages or articles may indicate ill will and not just ineptitude, in which case it is time for the ban-stick. Likewise, a bad edit in the Uncyclopedia: or Template: namespaces shows intent to disrupt the website and not just tell a joke that isn't funny. * Unwillingness to learn from explanation on the user talk page means a ban may be expedient to show the user that he must follow the explanation.

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software