About: Is-ought problem

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Is-ought problem Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

The Is-ought problem is a problem attributed to David Hume which asks how we can derive a normative claim from a descriptive claim. It is highly related to the Fact-Value distinction. People who believe in the is-ought problem consider deriving normative claims from descriptive claims an informal fallacy. They call it the Is-Ought fallacy and sometimes the Naturalistic fallacy. It is sometimes confused with the appeal to nature fallacy.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Is-ought problem
rdfs:comment	The Is-ought problem is a problem attributed to David Hume which asks how we can derive a normative claim from a descriptive claim. It is highly related to the Fact-Value distinction. People who believe in the is-ought problem consider deriving normative claims from descriptive claims an informal fallacy. They call it the Is-Ought fallacy and sometimes the Naturalistic fallacy. It is sometimes confused with the appeal to nature fallacy.
dbkwik:philosophy/...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/cPwUYsUhjKJ1hGUS4q1N6A==
abstract	The Is-ought problem is a problem attributed to David Hume which asks how we can derive a normative claim from a descriptive claim. It is highly related to the Fact-Value distinction. People who believe in the is-ought problem consider deriving normative claims from descriptive claims an informal fallacy. They call it the Is-Ought fallacy and sometimes the Naturalistic fallacy. It is sometimes confused with the appeal to nature fallacy.

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software