About: Star Trek Expanded Universe talk:Featured articles/Archive   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

I honestly think that certain articles are no longer worthy of FA status, especially my rank page. Can some of them be voted to be removed from FA status? --Kevin W. Adm•Tlk 21:58, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Star Trek Expanded Universe talk:Featured articles/Archive
rdfs:comment
  • I honestly think that certain articles are no longer worthy of FA status, especially my rank page. Can some of them be voted to be removed from FA status? --Kevin W. Adm•Tlk 21:58, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
dbkwik:stexpanded/...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • I honestly think that certain articles are no longer worthy of FA status, especially my rank page. Can some of them be voted to be removed from FA status? --Kevin W. Adm•Tlk 21:58, 6 January 2007 (UTC) The ones before October 2006 weren't done under the FA policy, so I don't think they should be listed at all, really. --TimPendragon 22:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC) The Borg definitely shouldn't be there, since that's basically just an MA clone. --TimPendragon 22:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC) I'd say get rid of everything before November. None of those articles really deserve FA status. --Kevin W. Adm•Tlk 22:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC) When I set this up - I went back though all changes I could find on the main page and "reverse engineer" what was considered (by Luke80) as Featured Articles and listed them here. It's part of STEU's "past" and I'm not sure if I'm ready to "re-write" history. I see both sides of the arguement and as of right now I'd rather save this to show how we have grown but if the community feels it should be "updated/re-written" I will support that as well. --Image:USS Enterprise Command Pin.png Sneg Admin•Talk 22:31, 6 January 2007 (UTC) At least some kind of separation between the "pre-policy" and "post-policy" articles is necessary, I think, with a note saying something to the effect of "these articles were given 'featured' status before any criteria had been set." --TimPendragon 22:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC) Not a bad idea. Will have to think about how to phrase it so it sounds nice. --Image:USS Enterprise Command Pin.png Sneg Admin•Talk 17:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software