Attributes | Values |
---|
rdfs:label
| - Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive-2014-08
|
Keep
| - --08-07
- --08-08
- --08-12
- --08-26
- --08-02
- #Sigh. Has uncy become an unthinking and unreading nanny state??? This page is a feature worthy satire about all the films in which Hollywood and other perverts made films about young girls that other perverts would like to have sex with. It's a satire on an entre genre, is well written, and makes its intended case very well. For new users, this page was written by a woman, a very talented writer named Miley Spears. If we huff this, good heavens, what is the world of uncy coming to? Aleister 23:30 9=8=14
#:Hi. Horatio, I apologize about my last comments, kind of harsh. I was just blowing off steam at what I see as a cultural shift here which hurts the purpose of the wiki. I'll comment about this nommed page as the case in point. The author of the piece is a user named User:Miley Spears. Please study her page and links. She is a young woman herself, not very far removed from the pre-teen years , and she wrote a wonderful satire which is a "turn it on its head" satire. The page means the opposite of what it says. She shows us that Hollywood has had a long term run of presenting young girls as sexual objects. That's a history which Miley Spears - finds reprehensible. That's the theme of the page. To push what they've done into the reader's face, to shove it in there so deep, to show them, from their own disgust, just how reprehensible the practice comes across to Miley. Being a good satire writer she, through the vehicle of satire, is able to make the reader aware of this reprehensible pattern which is seldom talked about in polite society. That's what uncy is for, regarding some aspects of writing, to offer a place for authors to play in which publishes articles like this which serve exactly the purpose that they were written for. That's my personal take on it, and the author, who no longer writes here may or may not agree with me. I think she would. So could you please at least read the page again from that point-of-view, and see if it at least is as valid as your present point-of-view. Thanks man, and my apologies again. Aleister 3:14 10-8-14
- #This 2008 UnNews is not excellent; it is not based on real news and is mostly ridicule of Michiganders and a rant about former Rep. Stupak. But it is not delete-worthy. SPIKE/signature(17:43 25-Jul-14)
|
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
Comments
| - --08-07
- --08-08
- --08-10
- --08-12
- --08-27
- --08-19
- --08-22
- --08-28
- --07-28
- *Nominator finally applied so I reset the clock, even though nominator is the only person who needs "notification." I followed the initial template to its other users, including Forum:Picture will noy shrink [sic], where wrote, "Templates, in general, are you saying that you care about a page, but not enough to put any real thought into it." And added, "any template that is a "canned joke" or states obvious useless information sucks. Basically, the same joke told 50 times is no longer funny." SPIKE/signature(17:01 30-Jul-14)
- *Saved in 2007; not much changed since then except to add numbers between the numbers. SPIKE/signature(13:06 21-Aug-14)
|
delnumber
| - 0(xsd:integer)
- 1(xsd:integer)
- 2(xsd:integer)
- 3(xsd:integer)
- 4(xsd:integer)
- 5(xsd:integer)
- 6(xsd:integer)
- 7(xsd:integer)
|
keepnumber
| - 0(xsd:integer)
- 1(xsd:integer)
- 2(xsd:integer)
- 3(xsd:integer)
- 5(xsd:integer)
|
delete
| - --07-21
- --07-23
- --07-24
- --07-30
- --08-05
- --08-06
- --08-07
- --08-08
- --08-11
- --08-16
- --08-23
- --08-25
- --07-19
- --07-26
- --08-09
- --08-21
- --08-28
- 604800.0
- --08-13
- 70.0
- # A ranty retelling of the same stereotypes of the Southern United States. It might be possible to write this with cleverness. SPIKE/signature(12:56 10-Aug-14)
|
Time
| - --07-21
- --07-23
- --07-24
- --07-25
- --07-30
- --08-06
- --08-07
- --08-08
- --08-10
- --08-11
- --08-16
- --08-25
- --08-09
- --08-20
- --08-21
- --08-28
- --07-18
- --07-28
- --08-02
- --08-13
|