| rdfs:comment
| - not been taken care of and no reliable sources Redsky89 (talk) 07:47, 13 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
* Whew. Busy whan a child actor: 136 episodes of Home and Away for the seven years from 2002 to 2009... until he left acting at 12 to be a "regular" kid. Enough to merit a redirect to Recurring characters of Home and Away#B. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
* At a guess I'd say there would be enough coverage in the TV mags, but so far we don't have it sourced, and there's not much online, so I agree wit
|
| abstract
| - not been taken care of and no reliable sources Redsky89 (talk) 07:47, 13 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
* Whew. Busy whan a child actor: 136 episodes of Home and Away for the seven years from 2002 to 2009... until he left acting at 12 to be a "regular" kid. Enough to merit a redirect to Recurring characters of Home and Away#B. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
* At a guess I'd say there would be enough coverage in the TV mags, but so far we don't have it sourced, and there's not much online, so I agree with the redirect for now. I imagine he will satisfy WP:N at some point, but we can write the sourced article then. --99of9 (talk) 10:25, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
* He seems to have some mild merit when we refer to WP:NACTOR because he was a recurrent character and participated in more than one show. HOWEVER, the notability guidelines say that just satisfying the basic criteria is not a guarantee of inclusion and the lack of verifiable reliable sources makes me lean towards a Delete. I am, however, hoping that he makes it big in the future and allow us to write a worthy and decent article about him. Also, remember that an abandoned/neglected article is not necessarily grounds for deletion. See WP:NEGLECT. -- Loukinho (talk) 03:15, 22 June 2012 (UTC). Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 14:31, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)