About: MicroWiki:Community Portal/Archive 2   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Do we really need :Category:Micronationalists|this category? I mean, we already have one and its sub-cats, which work fine. It just seems odd that we need a separate category when it's pretty obvious that every person with an article on this wiki is a micronationalist! Personally, I wanted to propose it for deletion, but before doing that and making a bunch of edits, I wanted to know if there are any particular reasons for keeping it. And don't worry about the mass of re-categorising edits that have to be done if the cat is deleted: I brought this up and I'll clean up the mess xD --SerCenKing Talk 16:04, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • MicroWiki:Community Portal/Archive 2
rdfs:comment
  • Do we really need :Category:Micronationalists|this category? I mean, we already have one and its sub-cats, which work fine. It just seems odd that we need a separate category when it's pretty obvious that every person with an article on this wiki is a micronationalist! Personally, I wanted to propose it for deletion, but before doing that and making a bunch of edits, I wanted to know if there are any particular reasons for keeping it. And don't worry about the mass of re-categorising edits that have to be done if the cat is deleted: I brought this up and I'll clean up the mess xD --SerCenKing Talk 16:04, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
abstract
  • Do we really need :Category:Micronationalists|this category? I mean, we already have one and its sub-cats, which work fine. It just seems odd that we need a separate category when it's pretty obvious that every person with an article on this wiki is a micronationalist! Personally, I wanted to propose it for deletion, but before doing that and making a bunch of edits, I wanted to know if there are any particular reasons for keeping it. And don't worry about the mass of re-categorising edits that have to be done if the cat is deleted: I brought this up and I'll clean up the mess xD --SerCenKing Talk 16:04, August 28, 2010 (UTC) I can do that for you babe. xD You can work on the "Observergate" article if you want, as personally, I also don't see why we should keep it. I remember noticing that category in the past as well, and wondered what it was used for, but now I can say it's useless. --Cajak [★MicroWiki Admin★] 18:45, August 28, 2010 (UTC) Cool, I'll wait a day to see if other guys have something to say. If not we can proceed to prod and update the cats. --SerCenKing Talk 22:16, August 28, 2010 (UTC) I'm fine with it because if you're on here, it's heavily implied you're already a micronationalist. File:Yabloko coa.png Aldrich Lucas talk contributions 23:27, August 28, 2010 (UTC) Sounds fine to me :) Makes sense anyway. § A-One § Admin (Talk • Contribs) 09:42, August 29, 2010 (UTC) Right, since we had two users and both of our two active admin agree on this, I went ahead and removed the category from the pages. I've also proposed the category for deletion. --SerCenKing Talk 14:38, August 29, 2010 (UTC) .. and it was deleted :D I mean, it was obviously useless now. --Cajak [★MicroWiki Admin★] 16:09, August 29, 2010 (UTC) Oh, okay. I thought I wasn't considered a micronationalist for some reason. --Secundomia (talk),(Contributions),(blog),(followed pages) 00:00, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software