About: Articles for deletion/JOURNEY OF 1000 MILES   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Doesn't meet WP:NMUSIC, is poorly written, and has an inappropriate tone. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect (musician). —Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 17:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC) * Should follow the fate of Perfect (musician). Also, I wish it would stop yelling. --BDD (talk) 17:59, 1 June 2012 (UTC) Notability of the artist is unrelated to notability to one of the artist's albums. From WP:NALBUMS: "An album requires its own notability, and that notability is not inherited and requires independent evidence. That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article. Conversely, an album does not need to be by a notable artist to require a standalone article if it meets the General notability guideline."

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Articles for deletion/JOURNEY OF 1000 MILES
rdfs:comment
  • Doesn't meet WP:NMUSIC, is poorly written, and has an inappropriate tone. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect (musician). —Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 17:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC) * Should follow the fate of Perfect (musician). Also, I wish it would stop yelling. --BDD (talk) 17:59, 1 June 2012 (UTC) Notability of the artist is unrelated to notability to one of the artist's albums. From WP:NALBUMS: "An album requires its own notability, and that notability is not inherited and requires independent evidence. That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article. Conversely, an album does not need to be by a notable artist to require a standalone article if it meets the General notability guideline."
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:speedydelet...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Doesn't meet WP:NMUSIC, is poorly written, and has an inappropriate tone. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect (musician). —Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 17:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC) * Should follow the fate of Perfect (musician). Also, I wish it would stop yelling. --BDD (talk) 17:59, 1 June 2012 (UTC) Notability of the artist is unrelated to notability to one of the artist's albums. From WP:NALBUMS: "An album requires its own notability, and that notability is not inherited and requires independent evidence. That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article. Conversely, an album does not need to be by a notable artist to require a standalone article if it meets the General notability guideline." Thus, in my opinion, these two AfD's should be discussed separately.—Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 18:36, 1 June 2012 (UTC) * Fair enough, but being unfamiliar with the subject, I'd say a shared fate is appropriate in this case. --BDD (talk) 18:55, 1 June 2012 (UTC) * Keep for now. See the AfD for the artist. The yelling is easily solved, as are the other issues (none of which are a reason for deletion). Drmies (talk) 18:08, 1 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 1 June 2012 (UTC) * Looking over the artist AFD, I'm going to say keep. But, you know. Without the yelling. --BDD (talk) 17:03, 2 June 2012 (UTC) * Comment— This short blurb and this review are the only sources I can find that go into any detail whatsoever about the album, and it doesn't really do much for the assertion of the album's notability. If anyone can find a reliable source or two that can show this album's notability, I'd change my mind, but so far, there's so material I can see that is deserving of its own article, rather than being incorporated into Perfect (musician).—Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 15:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 8 June 2012 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software