Hi, I worked on Glasgow when I first started doing Uncylopedia, it's alright but some suggestions for improvement would not go a miss, thanks for your help. Stavrogin 15:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Glasgow
|
| rdfs:comment
| - Hi, I worked on Glasgow when I first started doing Uncylopedia, it's alright but some suggestions for improvement would not go a miss, thanks for your help. Stavrogin 15:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Mcomment
| |
| Pcomment
| - The spelling and grammar in this article is quite brilliant, actually, couldn't find a fault with it. What's keeping this score down is the lists. I know all of these articles have lists. However, they are painfully unfunny and mess up what is a decent article. And they look bad. As an aside, the pictures make the "Sport" heading look iffy.
|
| Icomment
| - The only image that I would say is funny is the Rangers/Celtic fan one. The flag isn't done very well and just looks amateurish, the Industrial Glasgow one is confusing and the unique look one seems fairly random stuck in the middle of "Culture". It could definitely do with some more Scots-centric images.
|
| Pscore
| |
| Ccomment
| - The "Big City is Small and Crap" concept. It has its merits, but its stock at this point and something new would be refreshing. As I said, I really like the big quote idea, and putting some more emphasis and expansion on that could be a winner.
|
| Cscore
| |
| Hcomment
| - This wasn't really funny overall, but it was much better than some town/city articles I've read. The quote is just brilliant, a great laugh. However, the rest of the article just doesn't do that justice, as all it is doing is basically putting Glasgow down and using stereotypes, neither of which methods are funny. The "Politics" subsection should either be massively rewriten or removed entirely, it really isn't good.
|
| Iscore
| |
| Hscore
| |
| Fcomment
| - I want this to be good. I really do. But it's a town/city article, and I really think you'll have an uphill struggle with it, they're like band articles to get good.
|
| dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| abstract
| - Hi, I worked on Glasgow when I first started doing Uncylopedia, it's alright but some suggestions for improvement would not go a miss, thanks for your help. Stavrogin 15:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)